The politeness bias and the society of strangers. (November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ye, Zhengdao
• Is Part Of: Language sciences. Volume 76(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-11
• Subjects: Politeness -- The society of strangers -- East Asian pragmatics -- Chinese social interaction -- Social categorisation -- Linguaculture; Linguistics -- Periodicals; Language and languages -- Periodicals; Linguistique -- Périodiques; Langage et langues -- Périodiques; Language and languages; Linguistics; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 405
• DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.06.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0388-0001

Abstract

Abstract: This paper argues that politeness, a notion central to many theories of social interaction and pragmatics, is fundamentally biased towards models of social interaction based on the 'society of strangers' (as opposed to the 'society of intimates'; cf. Givón, 2005), consistent with the values and cultural ethos of Anglophone societies. It illustrates this by comparing Anglophone communicative styles to Chinese interactional style characteristic of the 'society of intimates', and by tracing its roots to eighteenth-century Britain, often referred to as the 'age of politeness' (e.g. Klein, 2002). It makes two points. First, the communicative style of undifferentiated social relations reflected in the politeness concept has left unexplored an important dimension of social relation categories in the study of human social interaction. Second, to break the spell of the politeness biases, it is important to examine native terms and concepts which are key to unlocking the interactional patterns and styles within a speech community. By offering a review of seminal critiques of the politeness theory written from the perspective of Japanese and Chinese, and by providing a Chinese perspective on the interplay between social categorisation and social interaction, this study is firmly placed in the emic tradition of East Asian pragmatics. Highlights: Politeness is biased towards models of social interaction in a 'society of strangers'. These models emerged in eighteenth-century Britain. In societies of strangers and societies of intimates (the Chinese model), social interactions differ. In societies of intimates, the model derives from in-groups, typically families. For researchers to avoid the politeness bias, examining native terms and concepts of a linguaculture is crucial.