Wind-induced cladding and structural loads on low-rise buildings with 4:12-sloped hip roofs. Issue 193 (October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shao, Shuai; Tian, Yuji; Yang, Qingshan; Stathopoulos, Ted
• Is Part Of: Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics. Issue 193(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-10
• Subjects: Wind-induced pressures -- Cladding loads -- Structural loads -- Hip-roofed -- Low-rise buildings -- L- and T-shaped -- Wind tunnel test -- Finite element model; Wind-pressure -- Periodicals; Buildings -- Aerodynamics -- Periodicals; Pression du vent -- Périodiques; Constructions -- Aérodynamique -- Périodiques; Buildings -- Aerodynamics; Wind-pressure; Periodicals
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.103948
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-6105

Abstract

Abstract: The characteristics of cladding and structural loads for 4:12-sloped hip-roofed low-rise buildings with rectangular, L- and T-shaped plans are examined, based on wind tunnel data and three-dimensional linear computational models. Regarding cladding loads, the rectangular gable roof incurs more considerable local suction, compared with the rectangular hip roof. However, due to building plan configurations, intense suction and positive pressure are distinctly distributed on roofs and walls around building re-entrant corners of hip-roofed non-rectangular buildings. Considering structural loads, very high pressures act on the gable-roofed end frame, compared with those on the corresponding hip-roofed frames. Furthermore, the building plan impact on structural load patterns varying with wind directions and on most critical values is clear. Particularly, the most critical structural loads acting on intermediate and penultimate frames of wings of L-shaped hip-roofed buildings and side wings of T-shaped cases, show a 25% maximum increase. However, regarding the central wings of T-shaped buildings, results generally fall within the same range with those of the rectangular and L-shaped buildings. In addition, the structural connections and boundary conditions significantly influence structural load magnitudes and distribution shapes. Finally, the effect of horizontal aspect ratios on both cladding and structural loads is found to be minimal. Highlights: Wind effects of low buildings with various roof and plan configurations are examined. Cladding wind loads are together influenced by roof shapes and building plans. As against gable-roofed case, structural loads of hip-roofed frames reduce clearly. Building plan impact is clear for patterns and magnitudes of structural wind loads. Conditions of connection and boundary significantly affect frame load distributions.