Constructing a longitudinal database of targeted regulation of abortion providers laws. (17th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Austin, Nichole; Harper, Sam
• Is Part Of: Health services research. Volume 54:Number 5(2019)
• Page Start: 1084
• Page End: 1089
• Publication Date: 2019-06-17
• Subjects: abortion -- supply‐side policies -- women's health; Medical care -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; Hospital care -- Periodicals; Health services administration -- Periodicals; 362
• DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13185
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-9124

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To build a longitudinal state‐level database on targeted regulation of abortion providers (TRAP) laws. Data Sources: Primary sources included state websites, Lexis Nexis Quicklaw, and WestlawNext. We used a range of secondary sources to pinpoint policy timing. Study Design: This was a state‐level review of TRAP shifts from 1973 to present. Data Collection: We captured data on TRAP policy activity and timing, focusing specifically on ambulatory surgical center (ASC) laws, admitting privilege requirements, and transfer agreements. Principal Findings: Twenty‐five states had ever enacted an ASC, admitting privilege, or transfer agreement law. Many currently face legal challenges. Conclusions: Targeted regulation of abortion providers laws are favored by many states as a way to regulate abortion provision. These data can be used to better understand the impact of these laws.