Do nitric oxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide really qualify as 'gasotransmitters' in bacteria?. (6th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wareham, Lauren K.; Southam, Hannah M.; Poole, Robert K.
• Is Part Of: Biochemical Society transactions. Volume 46:Number 5(2018)
• Page Start: 1107
• Page End: 1118
• Publication Date: 2018-09-06
• Subjects: carbon monoxide -- cellular signalling -- gasotransmitters -- hydrogen sulfide -- nitric oxide; Biochemistry -- Congresses; 572
• DOI: 10.1042/BST20170311
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-5127

Abstract

Abstract : A gasotransmitter is defined as a small, generally reactive, gaseous molecule that, in solution, is generated endogenously in an organism and exerts important signalling roles. It is noteworthy that these molecules are also toxic and antimicrobial. We ask: is this definition of a gasotransmitter appropriate in the cases of nitric oxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide (H2 S) in microbes? Recent advances show that, not only do bacteria synthesise each of these gases, but the molecules also have important signalling or messenger roles in addition to their toxic effects. However, strict application of the criteria proposed for a gasotransmitter leads us to conclude that the term 'small molecule signalling agent', as proposed by Fukuto and others, is preferable terminology.