Evaluation of 4D flow MRI-based non-invasive pressure assessment in aortic coarctations. (20th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Saitta, Simone; Pirola, Selene; Piatti, Filippo; Votta, Emiliano; Lucherini, Federico; Pluchinotta, Francesca; Carminati, Mario; Lombardi, Massimo; Geppert, Christian; Cuomo, Federica; Figueroa, Carlos Alberto; Xu, Xiao Yun; Redaelli, Alberto
• Is Part Of: Journal of biomechanics. Volume 94(2019)
• Page Start: 13
• Page End: 21
• Publication Date: 2019-09-20
• Subjects: Aortic coarctation -- 4D flow MRI -- Pressure Poisson equation -- Non-invasive pressure difference estimation -- Fluid dynamics; Animal mechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Mécanique animale -- Périodiques; Biomécanique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 571.4305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.07.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9290

Abstract

Abstract: Severity of aortic coarctation (CoA) is currently assessed by estimating trans-coarctation pressure drops through cardiac catheterization or echocardiography. In principle, more detailed information could be obtained non-invasively based on space- and time-resolved magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow) data. Yet the limitations of this imaging technique require testing the accuracy of 4D flow-derived hemodynamic quantities against other methodologies. With the objective of assessing the feasibility and accuracy of this non-invasive method to support the clinical diagnosis of CoA, we developed an algorithm (4DF-FEPPE) to obtain relative pressure distributions from 4D flow data by solving the Poisson pressure equation. 4DF-FEPPE was tested against results from a patient-specific fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation, whose patient-specific boundary conditions were prescribed based on 4D flow data. Since numerical simulations provide noise-free pressure fields on fine spatial and temporal scales, our analysis allowed to assess the uncertainties related to 4D flow noise and limited resolution. 4DF-FEPPE and FSI results were compared on a series of cross-sections along the aorta. Bland-Altman analysis revealed very good agreement between the two methodologies in terms of instantaneous data at peak systole, end-diastole and time-averaged values: biases (means of differences) were +0.4 mmHg, −1.1 mmHg and +0.6 mmHg, respectively. Limits of agreement (2 SD) were ±0.978 mmHg, ±1.06 mmHg and ±1.97 mmHg, respectively. Peak-to-peak and maximum trans-coarctation pressure drops obtained with 4DF-FEPPE differed from FSI results by 0.75 mmHg and −1.34 mmHg respectively. The present study considers important validation aspects of non-invasive pressure difference estimation based on 4D flow MRI, showing the potential of this technology to be more broadly applied to the clinical practice.