Pharmaceutical compounds removal by adsorption with commercial and reused carbon coming from a drinking water treatment plant. (20th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Luján-Facundo, M.J.; Iborra-Clar, M.I.; Mendoza-Roca, J.A.; Alcaina-Miranda, M.I.
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 238(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-11-20
• Subjects: Activated carbon -- Adsorption -- Pharmaceutical compounds -- Sequencing bath reactor; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117866
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: The concern for the presence of pharmaceutical compounds in purified wastewater has grown in recent years. In this context, efficient and economically viable processes are required for their removal. In this study, adsorption was conducted to assess the removal of ibuprofen, caffeine, diazepam and acetaminophen, both as separated processes as in combination with a biological process in sequencing batch reactors. Removal efficiencies of these pharmaceutical active compounds were evaluated using two commercial activated carbons in granular and powder form and a discarded (after its use) activated carbon from a drinking water treatment plant. Concerning the biological treatment tests, simulated municipal wastewater was doped with 3 mg/L of each pharmaceutical active compounds. Results showed that caffeine, acetaminophen and ibuprofen achieved excellent removal percentages, even without powder activated carbon addition (more than 94%); By contrast, whereas diazepam removal was low (lower than 50%); however, it was improved up to 68% with the powder activated carbon addition to the sequencing batch reactors. Regarding adsorption tests as separated process, ibuprofen was the pharmaceutical active compounds with the lowest removal percentage (around 50% for the granular activated carbon) and diazepam (around 80% for the granular activated carbon) was the compound with the maximum removal efficiency for the tested concentrations (between 0.5 and 3 mg/L). Finally, results were very promising for the reused activated carbon since the removal efficiency of the pharmaceutical active compounds was higher than 90% (except for ibuprofen) when 0.5 g/L of reused activated carbon was applied in powder form to solutions of 3 mg/L of each pharmaceutical active compounds. In this way, a low cost activated carbon could be applied in wastewater treatment plants for pharmaceutical active compounds removal. Highlights: Diazepam was the most persistent after a biological treatment. Adsorption process with powder AC achieved better results than granular AC. Ibuprofen was the PhAC with the lowest removal after the adsorption process. Diazepam was the PhAC with the maximum removal after the adsorption process. The discarded AC from a drinking water treatment plant yielded interesting results.