Environmental DNA provides quantitative estimates of a threatened salmon species. (September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shelton, Andrew Olaf; Kelly, Ryan P.; O'Donnell, James L.; Park, Linda; Schwenke, Piper; Greene, Correigh; Henderson, Richard A.; Beamer, Eric M.
• Is Part Of: Biological conservation. Volume 237(2019)
• Page Start: 383
• Page End: 391
• Publication Date: 2019-09
• Subjects: Oncorhynchus -- Abundance estimator -- Chinook salmon -- eDNA -- ESA -- Seine -- qPCR; Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals; Nature conservation -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.9516
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-3207

Abstract

Abstract: Species of conservation interest are often rare or elusive, and often require labor-intensive population surveys for management. Sampling genetic traces of such species from environmental media such as water, air, or soil (environmental DNA; eDNA) can provide noninvasive and cost-effective means of monitoring. However, eDNA results may not align with traditional survey methods (e.g., visual, net) making it difficult to interpret eDNA results. We present the results of parallel beach seine and quantitative-PCR (qPCR) surveys of a threatened Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) from Skagit Bay, an estuary in Washington, USA. Our replicated design and hierarchical statistical model assesses the abundance, biomass, and DNA concentration at two spatial scales (site- and population-) over five months. We find both eDNA- and seine-derived abundance indices reflect the seasonal migration of salmon; at the population-scale, eDNA and seines provide virtually identical quantitative information. At the site scale, the methods are less correlated, suggesting the methods reveal different information about a patchily distributed species. Environmental DNA may act to smooth otherwise patchy biological signals in space and time. Reduced within-site variability for eDNA relative to seines suggests that eDNA may offer more precise population estimates. We partition sources of variability in space and time and compare eDNA and seine surveys – a first, to our knowledge – and so reveal the behavior of eDNA in the field. Our results underscore the value of using eDNA in conjunction with traditional surveys. Combining eDNA and seine estimates should improve the population data on which management of threatened species depends. Highlights: eDNA can be used for the quantification of a threatened, highly mobile marine species Patterns of variability within- and among-sites reveal precision of eDNA surveys relative to traditional sampling methods eDNA provides distinct and complementary information to traditional surveys for marine species