Interventions for undergraduate and postgraduate medical learners with academic difficulties: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 56. (2nd September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lacasse, Miriam; Audétat, Marie-Claude; Boileau, Élisabeth; Caire Fon, Nathalie; Dufour, Marie-Hélène; Laferrière, Marie-Claude; Lafleur, Alexandre; La Rue, Ève; Lee, Shirley; Nendaz, Mathieu; Paquette Raynard, Emmanuelle; Simard, Caroline; Steinert, Yvonne; Théorêt, Johanne
• Is Part Of: Medical teacher. Volume 41:Number 9(2019)
• Page Start: 981
• Page End: 1001
• Publication Date: 2019-09-02
• Subjects: Medical education -- Periodicals; 610.711
• DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1596239
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0142-159X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Clinical teachers often struggle to report unsatisfactory trainee performance, partly because of a lack of evidence-based remediation options. Objectives: To identify interventions for undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) medical learners experiencing academic difficulties, link them to a theory-based framework and provide literature-based recommendations around their use. Methods: This systematic review searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, Education Source and PsycINFO (1990–2016) combining these concepts: medical education, professional competence/difficulty and educational support. Original research/innovation reports describing intervention(s) for UG/PG medical learners with academic difficulties were included. Data extraction employed Michie's Behavior Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy and program evaluation models from Stufflebeam and Kirkpatrick. Quality appraisal used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The authors synthesized extracted evidence by adapting the GRADE approach to formulate recommendations. Results: Sixty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria, most commonly addressing knowledge (66.2%), skills (53.9%) and attitudinal problems (26.2%), or learner personal issues (41.5%). The most common BCTs were Shaping knowledge, Feedback/monitoring, and Repetition/substitution . Quality appraisal was variable (MMAT 0–100%). A thematic content analysis identified 109 interventions (UG: n = 84, PG: n = 58), providing 24 strong, 48 moderate, 26 weak and 11 very weak recommendations. Conclusion: This review provides a repertoire of literature-based interventions for teaching/learning, faculty development, and research purposes.