(Ideo)Logical Reasoning: Ideology Impairs Sound Reasoning. Issue 8 (November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gampa, Anup; Wojcik, Sean P.; Motyl, Matt; Nosek, Brian A.; Ditto, Peter H.
• Is Part Of: Social psychological & personality science. Volume 10:Issue 8(2019)
• Page Start: 1075
• Page End: 1083
• Publication Date: 2019-11
• Subjects: belief bias -- political psychology -- ideology -- logical reasoning -- syllogistic reasoning; Personality -- Periodicals; Social psychology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 155.2
• DOI: 10.1177/1948550619829059
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1948-5506

Abstract

Beliefs shape how people interpret information and may impair how people engage in logical reasoning. In three studies, we show how ideological beliefs impair people's ability to (1) recognize logical validity in arguments that oppose their political beliefs and (2) recognize the lack of logical validity in arguments that support their political beliefs. We observed belief bias effects among liberals and conservatives who evaluated the logical soundness of classically structured logical syllogisms supporting liberal or conservative beliefs. Both liberals and conservatives frequently evaluated the logical structure of entire arguments based on the believability of arguments' conclusions, leading to predictable patterns of logical errors. As a result, liberals were better at identifying flawed arguments supporting conservative beliefs and conservatives were better at identifying flawed arguments supporting liberal beliefs. These findings illuminate one key mechanism for how political beliefs distort people's abilities to reason about political topics soundly.