A comparison of the length and width of static inked two-dimensional bare footprints found on a hard compared to a soft surface. Issue 4 (July 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comparison of the length and width of static inked two-dimensional bare footprints found on a hard compared to a soft surface. Issue 4 (July 2019)
- Main Title:
- A comparison of the length and width of static inked two-dimensional bare footprints found on a hard compared to a soft surface
- Authors:
- Curran, Michael
Holmes, Isabelle - Abstract:
- Abstract: In forensic intelligence-gathering it would be useful to evaluate if there are differences between static inked bare footprints captured on hard surfaces compared to soft surfaces. This was undertaken using samples from 30 undergraduate students. Initially a static footprint was taken for each participant on a hard surface and this was followed by a static footprint on a soft surface. On both occasions, the participants stood on an inkless mat and then on reactive paper, creating a two-dimensional print. The Reel method was used to analyse each footprint and the print was measured to see whether a difference existed between length and width (forefoot and rearfoot width) on a hard surface compared to a soft surface. The conclusion from this study was there is a statistically significant increase in length and width of a static bare footprint on a soft surface as opposed to a hard surface. If a forensic footprint examiner compares static bare footprints found on a soft surface and compares them to a static bare footprint of the same foot taken later, then the increase in both length and width of the footprints on a soft surface should be considered in the evaluation. Highlights: An increase in the mean length of a bare footprint on a soft surface An increase in the mean width (forefoot and heel) of a bare footprint on a soft surface Statistically significant increase in length of a bare footprint on a soft surface Statistically significant increase in width (forefootAbstract: In forensic intelligence-gathering it would be useful to evaluate if there are differences between static inked bare footprints captured on hard surfaces compared to soft surfaces. This was undertaken using samples from 30 undergraduate students. Initially a static footprint was taken for each participant on a hard surface and this was followed by a static footprint on a soft surface. On both occasions, the participants stood on an inkless mat and then on reactive paper, creating a two-dimensional print. The Reel method was used to analyse each footprint and the print was measured to see whether a difference existed between length and width (forefoot and rearfoot width) on a hard surface compared to a soft surface. The conclusion from this study was there is a statistically significant increase in length and width of a static bare footprint on a soft surface as opposed to a hard surface. If a forensic footprint examiner compares static bare footprints found on a soft surface and compares them to a static bare footprint of the same foot taken later, then the increase in both length and width of the footprints on a soft surface should be considered in the evaluation. Highlights: An increase in the mean length of a bare footprint on a soft surface An increase in the mean width (forefoot and heel) of a bare footprint on a soft surface Statistically significant increase in length of a bare footprint on a soft surface Statistically significant increase in width (forefoot and heel) of a bare footprint on a soft surface … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Science & justice. Volume 59:Issue 4(2019)
- Journal:
- Science & justice
- Issue:
- Volume 59:Issue 4(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 59, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 59
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0059-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 448
- Page End:
- 451
- Publication Date:
- 2019-07
- Subjects:
- Bare -- Footprints -- Soft -- Hard -- Surface -- Static
Forensic sciences -- Periodicals
Criminal investigation -- Periodicals
Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals
Jurisprudence -- Periodicals
Criminalistique -- Périodiques
Enquêtes criminelles -- Périodiques
Criminal investigation
Forensic sciences
Electronic journals
Periodicals
363.2505 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.forensic-science-society.org.uk/jnltop.html ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13550306 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/13550306 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/13550306 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.03.004 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1355-0306
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8134.129500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11611.xml