Field estimates of fitness costs of the pace‐of‐life in an endangered damselfly. (24th June 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Field estimates of fitness costs of the pace‐of‐life in an endangered damselfly. (24th June 2019)
- Main Title:
- Field estimates of fitness costs of the pace‐of‐life in an endangered damselfly
- Authors:
- Khelifa, Rassim
Zebsa, Rabah
Amari, Hichem
Mellal, Mohammed Khalil
Mahdjoub, Hayat - Abstract:
- Abstract: Theory predicts that within‐population differences in the pace‐of‐life can lead to cohort splitting and produce marked intraspecific variation in body size. Although many studies showed that body size is positively correlated with fitness, many argue that selection for the larger body is counterbalanced by opposing physiological and ecological selective mechanisms that favour smaller body. When a population split into cohorts with different paces of life (slow or fast cohort), one would expect to detect the fitness–size relationship among and within cohorts, that is, (a) slower‐developing cohort has larger body size and higher fitness than faster‐developing cohort, and (b) larger individuals within each cohort show higher fitness than smaller individuals. Here, we test these hypotheses in capture–mark–recapture field surveys that assess body size, lifespan, survival and lifetime mating success in two consecutive generations of a partially bivoltine aquatic insect, Coenagrion mercuriale, where the spring cohort is slower‐developing than the autumn cohort. As expected, body size was larger in the slow‐developing cohort, which is consistent with the temperature‐size rule and also with the duration of development. Body size seasonal variation was greater in slow‐developing cohort most likely because of the higher variation in age at maturity. Concordant with theory, survival probability, lifespan and lifetime mating success were higher in the slow‐developing cohort.Abstract: Theory predicts that within‐population differences in the pace‐of‐life can lead to cohort splitting and produce marked intraspecific variation in body size. Although many studies showed that body size is positively correlated with fitness, many argue that selection for the larger body is counterbalanced by opposing physiological and ecological selective mechanisms that favour smaller body. When a population split into cohorts with different paces of life (slow or fast cohort), one would expect to detect the fitness–size relationship among and within cohorts, that is, (a) slower‐developing cohort has larger body size and higher fitness than faster‐developing cohort, and (b) larger individuals within each cohort show higher fitness than smaller individuals. Here, we test these hypotheses in capture–mark–recapture field surveys that assess body size, lifespan, survival and lifetime mating success in two consecutive generations of a partially bivoltine aquatic insect, Coenagrion mercuriale, where the spring cohort is slower‐developing than the autumn cohort. As expected, body size was larger in the slow‐developing cohort, which is consistent with the temperature‐size rule and also with the duration of development. Body size seasonal variation was greater in slow‐developing cohort most likely because of the higher variation in age at maturity. Concordant with theory, survival probability, lifespan and lifetime mating success were higher in the slow‐developing cohort. Moreover, individual body size was positively correlated with survival and mating success in both cohorts. Our study confirms the fitness costs of fast pace‐of‐life and the benefits of larger body size to adult fitness. Abstract : Body size and fitness can change substantially among populations with different paces of life. We investigated inter‐population variation in fitness components of a bivoltine endangered damselfly (Coenagrion mercuriale) that produces a fast‐ and a slow‐developing cohort in a year. Slow‐developing cohort had a larger body size, longer lifespan, higher survival probability, and higher mating success. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of evolutionary biology. Volume 32:Number 9(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of evolutionary biology
- Issue:
- Volume 32:Number 9(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 32, Issue 9 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 32
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0032-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 943
- Page End:
- 954
- Publication Date:
- 2019-06-24
- Subjects:
- life history -- mating success -- odonate -- plasticity -- survival -- temperature‐size rule
Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals
Biology -- Periodicals
576.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1420-9101 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=jeb ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1010-061x;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jeb.13493 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1010-061X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4979.642100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11603.xml