Preferences for in‐person disclosure: Patients declining telephone disclosure characteristics and outcomes in the multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone study. Issue 2 (7th December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Preferences for in‐person disclosure: Patients declining telephone disclosure characteristics and outcomes in the multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone study. Issue 2 (7th December 2018)
- Main Title:
- Preferences for in‐person disclosure: Patients declining telephone disclosure characteristics and outcomes in the multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone study
- Authors:
- Beri, Nina
Patrick‐Miller, Linda J.
Egleston, Brian L.
Hall, Michael J.
Domchek, Susan M.
Daly, Mary B.
Ganschow, Pamela
Grana, Generosa
Olopade, Olufunmilayo I.
Fetzer, Dominique
Brandt, Amanda
Chambers, Rachelle
Clark, Dana F.
Forman, Andrea
Gaber, Rikki
Gulden, Cassandra
Horte, Janice
Long, Jessica
Lucas, Terra
Madaan, Shreshtha
Mattie, Kristin
McKenna, Danielle
Montgomery, Susan
Nielsen, Sarah
Powers, Jacquelyn
Rainey, Kim
Rybak, Christina
Savage, Michelle
Seelaus, Christina
Stoll, Jessica
Stopfer, Jill E.
Yao, Xinxin (Shirley)
Bradbury, Angela R.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Telephone disclosure of cancer genetic test results is noninferior to in‐person disclosure. However, how patients who prefer in‐person communication of results differ from those who agree to telephone disclosure is unclear but important when considering delivery models for genetic medicine. Patients undergoing cancer genetic testing were recruited to a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial (NCT01736345) comparing telephone to in‐person disclosure of genetic test results. We evaluated preferences for in‐person disclosure, factors associated with this preference and outcomes compared to those who agreed to randomization. Among 1178 enrolled patients, 208 (18%) declined randomization, largely given a preference for in‐person disclosure. These patients were more likely to be older ( P = 0.007) and to have had multigene panel testing ( P < 0.001). General anxiety ( P = 0.007), state anxiety ( P = 0.008), depression ( P = 0.011), cancer‐specific distress ( P = 0.021) and uncertainty ( P = 0.03) were higher after pretest counseling. After disclosure of results, they also had higher general anxiety ( P = 0.003), depression ( P = 0.002) and cancer‐specific distress ( P = 0.043). While telephone disclosure is a reasonable alternative to in‐person disclosure in most patients, some patients have a strong preference for in‐person communication. Patient age, distress and complexity of testing are important factors to consider and requests for in‐person disclosure shouldAbstract : Telephone disclosure of cancer genetic test results is noninferior to in‐person disclosure. However, how patients who prefer in‐person communication of results differ from those who agree to telephone disclosure is unclear but important when considering delivery models for genetic medicine. Patients undergoing cancer genetic testing were recruited to a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial (NCT01736345) comparing telephone to in‐person disclosure of genetic test results. We evaluated preferences for in‐person disclosure, factors associated with this preference and outcomes compared to those who agreed to randomization. Among 1178 enrolled patients, 208 (18%) declined randomization, largely given a preference for in‐person disclosure. These patients were more likely to be older ( P = 0.007) and to have had multigene panel testing ( P < 0.001). General anxiety ( P = 0.007), state anxiety ( P = 0.008), depression ( P = 0.011), cancer‐specific distress ( P = 0.021) and uncertainty ( P = 0.03) were higher after pretest counseling. After disclosure of results, they also had higher general anxiety ( P = 0.003), depression ( P = 0.002) and cancer‐specific distress ( P = 0.043). While telephone disclosure is a reasonable alternative to in‐person disclosure in most patients, some patients have a strong preference for in‐person communication. Patient age, distress and complexity of testing are important factors to consider and requests for in‐person disclosure should be honored when possible. Abstract : … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical genetics. Volume 95:Issue 2(2019)
- Journal:
- Clinical genetics
- Issue:
- Volume 95:Issue 2(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 95, Issue 2 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 95
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0095-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 293
- Page End:
- 301
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12-07
- Subjects:
- cancer genetic testing -- genetic counseling -- in‐person disclosure preference -- result disclosure -- telephone disclosure
Medical genetics -- Periodicals
616.0420 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/cge ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/cge.13474 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-9163
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.287000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11609.xml