Questioning triple rice intensification on the Vietnamese mekong delta floodplains: An environmental and economic analysis of current land-use trends and alternatives. (1st July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tran, Dung Duc; van Halsema, Gerardo; Hellegers, Petra J.G.J.; Ludwig, Fulco; Wyatt, Andrew
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental management. Volume 217(2018)
• Page Start: 429
• Page End: 441
• Publication Date: 2018-07-01
• Subjects: Costs and benefits -- Mekong delta -- Dike -- Farming system -- Rice; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 363.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.116
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-4797

Abstract

Abstract: Large areas of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta floodplains (VMDF) are protected by high dikes to facilitate three rice crops per year. While this has increased rice production, there is evidence that triple rice systems have negative long-term effects, both environmental and economic. Double rice cropping, or other alternatives, may be more advantageous. We analyzed the costs and benefits of intensive rice systems over time and compared these with alternatives farming systems, based on data collected via field surveys and interviews with farmers in two provinces in the VMDF. Results show that farmers in areas with dikes high enough for triple rice production incurred rising production costs over time. Production costs were 58%–91% higher in high-dike, triple crop areas, than in low-dike double rice crop areas. Higher production costs are mainly the result of increased fertilizer and pesticide use. Profitability of triple rice farming systems was initially 57% more compared to double crop systems. After about 15 years, however, triple rice farmers earned only 6% more than double crop counterparts. Our results indicate that alternative farming systems, such as rice combined with vegetables, fisheries or other flood-based livelihood, could offer greater benefits than intensive rice monocultures. Importantly, these higher benefits can be obtained without the environmental costs and impact currently endured across the delta with triple rice cultivation in high dikes. Highlights: More fertilizer and pesticide is used in rice production in areas with high dikes compared to areas with low dikes. Fertilizer and pesticide use increases over time in triple rice farming systems. The profitability of triple rice farming systems declines over time, due to increased production costs. Diversified farming systems within low dikes are more advantageous than intensive rice monoculture systems.