The valley of death, the technology pork barrel, and public support for large demonstration projects. (August 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The valley of death, the technology pork barrel, and public support for large demonstration projects. (August 2018)
- Main Title:
- The valley of death, the technology pork barrel, and public support for large demonstration projects
- Authors:
- Nemet, Gregory F.
Zipperer, Vera
Kraus, Martina - Abstract:
- Abstract: Moving non-incremental innovations from the pilot scale to full commercial scale raises questions about the need and implementation of public support. Heuristics from the literature put policy makers in a dilemma between addressing a market failure and acknowledging a government failure: incentives for private investments in large scale demonstrations are weak (the valley of death) but the track record of governance in large demonstration projects is poor (the technology pork barrel). These arguments are reassessed in the literature, particularly as to how they apply to supporting demonstration projects for decarbonizing industry. A new data set is built of 511 demonstration projects in nine technology areas and characteristics for each project are coded, including timing, motivations, scale, and the share of public funding. The literature and the results from the case studies have five main implications for policy makers in making decisions about demonstration support. Policy makers should consider: prioritizing learning, iteratively upscaling, engaging the private sector, disseminating knowledge widely, and making demand pull robust. Abstract : Highlights: Large scale demonstration projects require public support to cross valley of death. Perceived government failures imply that governments should not pick winners. We build a new dataset of characteristics of 511 demonstration projects. Recommend: prioritize learning, tolerate failures, and iterative up-scaling.Abstract: Moving non-incremental innovations from the pilot scale to full commercial scale raises questions about the need and implementation of public support. Heuristics from the literature put policy makers in a dilemma between addressing a market failure and acknowledging a government failure: incentives for private investments in large scale demonstrations are weak (the valley of death) but the track record of governance in large demonstration projects is poor (the technology pork barrel). These arguments are reassessed in the literature, particularly as to how they apply to supporting demonstration projects for decarbonizing industry. A new data set is built of 511 demonstration projects in nine technology areas and characteristics for each project are coded, including timing, motivations, scale, and the share of public funding. The literature and the results from the case studies have five main implications for policy makers in making decisions about demonstration support. Policy makers should consider: prioritizing learning, iteratively upscaling, engaging the private sector, disseminating knowledge widely, and making demand pull robust. Abstract : Highlights: Large scale demonstration projects require public support to cross valley of death. Perceived government failures imply that governments should not pick winners. We build a new dataset of characteristics of 511 demonstration projects. Recommend: prioritize learning, tolerate failures, and iterative up-scaling. Also: engage private sector, disseminate results, and develop robust demand pull. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Energy policy. Volume 119(2018)
- Journal:
- Energy policy
- Issue:
- Volume 119(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 119, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 119
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0119-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 154
- Page End:
- 167
- Publication Date:
- 2018-08
- Subjects:
- Demonstrations -- Technology push -- Demand pull -- Valley of death -- Low-carbon
Energy policy -- Periodicals
Politique énergétique -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
333.79 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03014215 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.008 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-4215
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3747.720000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11595.xml