Implementing assessments of robot‐assisted technical skill in urological education: a systematic review and synthesis of the validity evidence. (24th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Goldenberg, Mitchell G.; Lee, Jason Y.; Kwong, Jethro C.C.; Grantcharov, Teodor P.; Costello, Anthony
• Is Part Of: BJU international. Volume 122:Number 3(2018)
• Page Start: 501
• Page End: 519
• Publication Date: 2018-04-24
• Subjects: urology training -- robotic surgery -- technical skill assessment -- simulation -- education -- competency; Genitourinary organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Genitourinary organs -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Urology -- Periodicals; 616.6
• DOI: 10.1111/bju.14219
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1464-4096

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To systematically review and synthesise the validity evidence supporting intraoperative and simulation‐based assessments of technical skill in urological robot‐assisted surgery (RAS), and make evidence‐based recommendations for the implementation of these assessments in urological training. Materials and Methods: A literature search of the Medline, PsycINFO and Embase databases was performed. Articles using technical skill and simulation‐based assessments in RAS were abstracted. Only studies involving urology trainees or faculty were included in the final analysis. Results: Multiple tools for the assessment of technical robotic skill have been published, with mixed sources of validity evidence to support their use. These evaluations have been used in both the ex vivo and in vivo settings. Performance evaluations range from global rating scales to psychometrics, and assessments are carried out through automation, expert analysts, and crowdsourcing. Conclusion: There have been rapid expansions in approaches to RAS technical skills assessment, both in simulated and clinical settings. Alternative approaches to assessment in RAS, such as crowdsourcing and psychometrics, remain under investigation. Evidence to support the use of these metrics in high‐stakes decisions is likely insufficient at present.