Control banding assessment of exposure of offset printing workers to organic solvents. Issue 3 (16th June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tsukahara, Teruomi; Miyauchi, Hiroyuki; Kuwada, Daisuke; Kikuchi, Tomoko; Tsuda, Yoko; Yanagiba, Yukie; Arito, Heihachiro; Nomiyama, Tetsuo
• Is Part Of: Journal of occupational health. Volume 58:Issue 3(2016)
• Page Start: 314
• Page End: 319
• Publication Date: 2016-06-16
• Subjects: Organic solvents -- Control banding -- Exposure to solvents -- Offset printing -- small‐and mediumsized enterprises; Medicine, Industrial -- Periodicals; Industrial hygiene -- Periodicals; Medicine, Industrial; Occupational Diseases; Occupational Exposure; Occupational Health; Occupational Medicine; Periodicals; Periodical; Electronic journals; 613.62
• DOI: 10.1539/joh.15-0324-BR
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1341-9145

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: We aimed to assess the exposure of offset printing workers to hazardous substances in the rinsing processes of small‐sized companies using a control banding method. Methods: We obtained half‐year amounts of hazardous substances purchased through a questionnaire survey and the hazardous information from the safety data sheets (SDSs) and related literature. Results: The amount of petroleum kerosine and carbon hydride markedly increased in 2013 compared with that in 2010. In contrast, the amount of dichloromethane (DCM) decreased in 2013, and 1, 2‐dichloropropane (DCP) was not used in either 2010 or 2013. Mineral oil and xylene were allocated to Hazard Group D and judged to require Control Approach 3. In addition to DCM with Global Harmonization System's carcinogenic category 1, mildly treated mineral oil and solvent naphtha, allocated into Hazard Group E, are carcinogenic to humans and were judged to require Control Approach 4. There are two limitations of the control banding assessment: first, only limited and scarce hazard information could be obtained from SDSs, and second, safe‐sided judgment for control technology for industrial hygiene. Conclusion: Small‐sized enterprises are encouraged to implement control banding assessment for hazardous substances and to access expert advice available from Regional Industrial Health Centers. Easy access to appropriate expert advice is important to compensate for the limited and scarce hazard information and safe‐sided judgment for control technology for Control Approaches 3 and 4.