Comparing the toxic potency in vivo of long-chain perfluoroalkyl acids and fluorinated alternatives. (April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gomis, Melissa I.; Vestergren, Robin; Borg, Daniel; Cousins, Ian T.
• Is Part Of: Environment international. Volume 113(2018)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 9
• Publication Date: 2018-04
• Subjects: Environmental protection -- Periodicals; Environmental health -- Periodicals; Environmental monitoring -- Periodicals; Environmental Monitoring -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Protection -- Périodiques; Hygiène du milieu -- Périodiques; Environnement -- Surveillance -- Périodiques; Environmental health; Environmental monitoring; Environmental protection; Periodicals; 333.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.01.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-4120

Abstract

Abstract: Since 2000, long-chain perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) and their respective precursors have been replaced by numerous fluorinated alternatives. The main rationale for this industrial transition was that these alternatives were considered less bioaccumulative and toxic than their predecessors. In this study, we evaluated to what extent differences in toxicological effect thresholds for PFAAs and fluorinated alternatives, expressed as administered dose, were confounded by differences in their distribution and elimination kinetics. A dynamic one-compartment toxicokinetic (TK) model for male rats was constructed and evaluated using test data from toxicity studies for perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluoroctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and ammonium 2, 3, 3, 3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)-propanoate (GenX). Dose–response curves of liver enlargement from sub-chronic oral toxicity studies in male rats were converted to internal dose in serum and in liver to examine the toxicity ranking of PFAAs and fluorinated alternatives. Converting administered doses into equivalent serum and liver concentrations reduced the variability in the dose–response curves for PFBA, PFHxA, PFOA and GenX. The toxicity ranking using modeled serum (GenX > PFOA > PFHxA > PFBA) and liver (GenX > PFOA ≈ PFHxA ≈ PFBA) concentrations indicated that some fluorinated alternatives have similar or higher toxic potency than their predecessors when correcting for differences in toxicokinetics. For PFOS and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) the conversion from administered dose to serum concentration equivalents did not change the toxicity ranking. In conclusion, hazard assessment based on internal exposure allows evaluation of toxic potency and bioaccumulation potential independent of kinetics and should be considered when comparing fluorinated alternatives with their predecessors. Highlights: Administered doses of PFAAs in rats were converted into serum and liver concentrations using a one-box toxicokinetic model The PFAAs accumulation in serum and liver of rats increased with chain-length and was dependent on the functional group When considering toxicokinetics, the toxic potency became similar between fluorinated alternatives and their predecessors The lack of toxicokinetic and toxicity data made it impossible to assess the toxic potency of PFHxS, ADONA and PFNA