Economic benefits of reducing agricultural N losses to coastal waters for seaside recreation and real estate value in Denmark. (March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Andersen, Mikael Skou; Levin, Gregor; Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard
• Is Part Of: Marine pollution bulletin. Volume 140(2019)
• Page Start: 146
• Page End: 156
• Publication Date: 2019-03
• Subjects: Impact pathway analysis -- Benefit transfer -- Water Framework Directive (WFD) -- Nitrate leaching -- Secchi-depth; Marine pollution -- Periodicals; Marine Biology -- Periodicals; Water Pollution -- Periodicals; Mer -- Pollution -- Périodiques; Publications périodiques; Pollution des mers; Lutte antipollution; Electronic journals; 363.7394
• DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-326X

Abstract

Abstract: We estimate economic benefits for seaside recreation and waterfront property when reducing nitrogen leaching to coastal water bodies. We apply impact pathway and benefit transfer methodology, linking total nitrogen concentration to water clarity (Secchi-depth). Ten catchments are analyzed comparing results for 2010 to a policy scenario that complies with the EU Water Framework Directive. The scenario reduces leaching with 5200 ton N, downstream discharges to estuaries by 35% and provide significant Secchi-depth improvements. Our integrated assessment predicts an annual economic benefit for local residents of €35 million, and co-benefits of up to €57 million. Benefits are catchment-specific and differ for downstream discharges from €1 to €32 per kg N, while for upstream discharge losses they range up to €10 per kg N. When expressed per unit of farmland the policy scenario displays economic benefits spanning €8–176/ha. The span reflects the different physical, biological and human circumstances of each catchment. Highlights: The economic value of recreation and waterfront property increases with water clarity. Improving Secchi depth for WFD compliance provides annual benefits of €35 million. Co-benefits related to GHG, ammonia and drinking water could add up to €57 million. Local short-term water quality gains are valued higher than long-term regional gains. The economic value of reducing nitrogen differs among catchments and estuaries.