Comparative study of the conventional types of heat and mass exchangers to achieve the best design of dew point evaporative coolers at diverse climatic conditions. (15th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sohani, Ali; Sayyaadi, Hoseyn; Mohammadhosseini, Negar
• Is Part Of: Energy conversion and management. Volume 158(2018)
• Page Start: 327
• Page End: 345
• Publication Date: 2018-02-15
• Subjects: Best heat and mass exchanger -- Dew-point (M-cycle) indirect evaporative coolers -- Life-cycle cost analysis -- Multi-objective optimization -- Thermal comfort conditions -- Water consumption; Direct energy conversion -- Periodicals; Energy storage -- Periodicals; Energy transfer -- Periodicals; Énergie -- Conversion directe -- Périodiques; Direct energy conversion; Periodicals; 621.3105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.042
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0196-8904

Abstract

Highlights: A methodology to find the best designs of heat and mass exchangers were introduced. The best designs were found by optimization of all important performance criteria. A comparative analysis of various kinds of heat and mass exchanger was presented. Annual operation, as well as the ability to provide thermal comfort, was considered. The best type of dew-point cooler was introduced at diverse climatic conditions. Abstract: The objective of this research is a comparative analysis of various kinds of heat and mass exchangers of dew point indirect evaporative cooler. Considering three key performance parameters of an evaporative cooler, namely life-cycle cost, annual water consumption and the annual average of the coefficient of performance as objective functions, the best design of two popular types of the dew-point evaporative cooler (counter-regenerative and cross configurations) for employing in small-scale residential buildings was found through a multi-objective optimization approach. Both operational and geometric characteristics of the coolers were selected as the design (decision) variables while proper constraints such as thermal comfort were imposed. Afterward, between the optimized counter-regenerative and cross configurations, the foremost one was selected for representative cities of four diverse groups within the Köppen-Geiger climate classification system. It was found that in very hot and dry areas, the counter-regenerative configuration was the ideal choice while in other investigated climates, using cross configuration was a better alternative. Moreover, the results showed that in comparison to the base case conditions by using the best-optimized configurations, 64.4, 86.4, and 1039.0% improvements in life-cycle cost, the annual water consumption, and the annual average of the coefficient of performance were achieved, respectively.