Anticipatory practice and the making of surplus food. Issue 99 (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Midgley, Jane L.
• Is Part Of: Geoforum. Issue 99(2019)
• Page Start: 181
• Page End: 189
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: Surplus food -- Anticipation -- Market devices -- Redistribution -- United Kingdom; Geography -- Periodicals; Human geography -- Periodicals; Regional planning -- Periodicals; Sciences de la terre -- Périodiques; Géographie -- Périodiques; Géographie humaine -- Périodiques; Aménagement du territoire -- Périodiques; Earth sciences; Geography; Human geography; Regional planning; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 304.205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-7185

Abstract

Highlights: Qualitative study of a key UK surplus food social and charitable redistribution relationship. Anticipation is important for exploring the concept of surplus and its application to surplus food. Anticipatory practices express market concerns. Surplus food redistribution relies on pre-emptive and improvised actions to assure its future consumption. Actions are identified that keep surplus food categorised as food not waste. Abstract: This paper explores the practices that have evolved between a global food retailer and a leading charitable surplus food redistributor to enable the utilization of surplus food in community and charitable meal settings in the UK. I argue that to understand surplus food and its potential futures (consumed or wasted), closer engagement with anticipatory thinking is needed. Drawing on interview data with key stakeholders and observations of the food industry redistribution process the paper explores the anticipatory actions taken by different actors as they attempt to manage the possible futures of foods that become categorized as surplus. The paper shows how different market devices are used to manage market concerns about surplus food and work to assure its future consumption. The devices focus on managing the risks of the food becoming unsafe and the associated legal liabilities. The market concerns, as expressions of anticipatory thinking, inform a series of anticipatory practices throughout the redistribution process to enable all actors, and especially the Retailer, to trust in the process. The paper concludes by noting how reliant the redistribution process is on anticipatory practices, especially pre-emption and improvisation to make the process workable, but also how these work to contain the various concerns within market arrangements. The paper highlights the importance of anticipation as a theoretical basis for exploring surplus food and the concept of surplus more widely.