Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments. (January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Garrett, R.D.; Levy, S.; Carlson, K.M.; Gardner, T.A.; Godar, J.; Clapp, J.; Dauvergne, P.; Heilmayr, R.; le Polain de Waroux, Y.; Ayre, B.; Barr, R.; Døvre, B.; Gibbs, H.K.; Hall, S.; Lake, S.; Milder, J.C.; Rausch, L.L.; Rivero, R.; Rueda, X.; Sarsfield, R.; Soares-Filho, B.; Villoria, N.
• Is Part Of: Global environmental change. Volume 54(2019)
• Page Start: 135
• Page End: 147
• Publication Date: 2019-01
• Subjects: Agriculture -- Forestry -- Supply chain -- Conservation -- Voluntary environmental policies -- Sustainability standards; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Human ecology -- Periodicals; Nature -- Effect of human beings on -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques; Écologie humaine -- Périodiques; Homme -- Influence sur la nature -- Périodiques; Environmental policy; Human ecology; Nature -- Effect of human beings on; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.7
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-3780

Abstract

Highlights: Zero-deforestation commitments are pledges to end deforestation in a supply chain. We develop criteria to assess the expected effectiveness of a company's commitment. We use these assessment criteria to evaluate existing commitments. We find several weaknesses across commitments that reduce expected effectiveness. We recommend changes in commitment targets, deadlines, and implementation. Abstract: Zero-deforestation commitments are a type of voluntary sustainability initiative that companies adopt to signal their intention to reduce or eliminate deforestation associated with commodities that they produce, trade, and/or sell. Because each company defines its own zero-deforestation commitment goals and implementation mechanisms, commitment content varies widely. This creates challenges for the assessment of commitment implementation or effectiveness. Here, we develop criteria to assess the potential effectiveness of zero-deforestation commitments at reducing deforestation within a company supply chain, regionally, and globally. We apply these criteria to evaluate 52 zero-deforestation commitments made by companies identified by Forest 500 as having high deforestation risk. While our assessment indicates that existing commitments converge with several criteria for effectiveness, they fall short in a few key ways. First, they cover just a small share of the global market for deforestation-risk commodities, which means that their global impact is likely to be small. Second, biome-wide implementation is only achieved in the Brazilian Amazon. Outside this region, implementation occurs mainly through certification programs, which are not adopted by all producers and lack third-party near-real time deforestation monitoring. Additionally, around half of all commitments include zero-net deforestation targets and future implementation deadlines, both of which are design elements that may reduce effectiveness. Zero-net targets allow promises of future reforestation to compensate for current forest loss, while future implementation deadlines allow for preemptive clearing. To increase the likelihood that commitments will lead to reduced deforestation across all scales, more companies should adopt zero-gross deforestation targets with immediate implementation deadlines and clear sanction-based implementation mechanisms in biomes with high risk of forest to commodity conversion.