Description and prediction of time-to-attainment of excellent recovery for borderline patients followed prospectively for 20 years. (April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zanarini, Mary C.; Temes, Christina M.; Frankenburg, Frances R.; Reich, D. Bradford; Fitzmaurice, Garrett M.
• Is Part Of: Psychiatry research. Volume 262(2018)
• Page Start: 40
• Page End: 45
• Publication Date: 2018-04
• Subjects: Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- periodicals; Psychiatrie -- Périodiques; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.034
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0165-1781

Abstract

Abstract: One purpose of this study was to determine the cumulative rates of excellent recovery for borderline patients and axis II comparison subjects followed prospectively for 20 years. Another purpose was to find the best set of baseline predictors of excellent recovery for borderline patients. A total of 290 inpatients meeting rigorous criteria for borderline personality disorder and 72 axis II comparison subjects completed semistructured interviews and self-report measures during their index admission. Subjects were reassessed prospectively over 10 contiguous two-year waves of follow-up. Thirty-nine percent of borderline patients and 73% of personality-disordered comparison subjects met our operationalized definition of excellent recovery (concurrent remission of borderline or another primary personality disorder, good social and full-time vocational functioning, and absence of an axis I disorder associated decreased social and/or vocational functioning). Five variables formed our multivariate predictive model of excellent recovery for borderline patients: higher IQ, good childhood work history, good adult vocational record, lower trait neuroticism, and higher trait agreeableness. The results of this study suggest that complete recovery is difficult for borderline patients to achieve even over long periods of time. They also suggest that competence displayed in both childhood and adulthood is the best predictor of this important outcome. Highlights: Borderline patients had a lower rate of good recovery than comparison subjects. This rate was equal to the rate achieved by borderline patients at 16-year follow-up. Borderline patients had a lower rate of excellent recovery than comparison subjects. Excellent recovery was predicted by IQ, work history, neuroticism, and agreeableness.