A cultural theory of drinking water risks, values and institutional change. (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Koehler, Johanna; Rayner, Steve; Katuva, Jacob; Thomson, Patrick; Hope, Rob
• Is Part Of: Global environmental change. Volume 50(2018)
• Page Start: 268
• Page End: 277
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: Cultural theory -- Water security -- Risk -- Institutions -- Sustainable development -- Kenya; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Human ecology -- Periodicals; Nature -- Effect of human beings on -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques; Écologie humaine -- Périodiques; Homme -- Influence sur la nature -- Périodiques; Environmental policy; Human ecology; Nature -- Effect of human beings on; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.7
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-3780

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: Cultural theory is applied to waterpoint management drawing on a 3500-household panel. SDG progress requires institutional response to perceived and observed water risks. Networking management cultures at scale can reduce drinking water risks. Pluralist solutions between the state, market and communities can create value. Abstract: Global progress towards the goal of universal, safely managed drinking water services will be shaped by the dynamic relationship between water risks, values and institutions. We apply Mary Douglas' cultural theory to rural waterpoint management and discuss its operationalisation in pluralist arrangements through networking different management cultures at scale. The theory is tested in coastal Kenya, an area that typifies the challenges faced across Africa in providing rural communities with safely managed water. Drawing on findings from a longitudinal study of 3500 households, we examine how different management cultures face and manage operational, financial, institutional and environmental risks. This paper makes the case for cooperative solutions across systems where current policy effectively separates communities from the state or markets. The contribution of this research is both a theoretical and empirical case to consider pluralist institutional arrangements that enable risks and responsibilities to be re-conceptualised and re-allocated between the state, market and communities to create value for rural water users.