Determining light stress responses for a tropical multi-species seagrass assemblage. (March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Statton, John; McMahon, Kathryn; Lavery, Paul; Kendrick, Gary A.
• Is Part Of: Marine pollution bulletin. Volume 128(2018)
• Page Start: 508
• Page End: 518
• Publication Date: 2018-03
• Subjects: Dredging -- Light reduction -- Tropical seagrass -- Stress -- Response -- Seagrass assemblage; Marine pollution -- Periodicals; Marine Biology -- Periodicals; Water Pollution -- Periodicals; Mer -- Pollution -- Périodiques; Publications périodiques; Pollution des mers; Lutte antipollution; Electronic journals; 363.7394
• DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.01.060
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-326X

Abstract

Abstract: Existing mitigations to address deterioration in water clarity associated with human activities are based on responses from single seagrass species but may not be appropriate for diverse seagrass assemblages common to tropical waters. We present findings from a light experiment designed to determine the effects of magnitude and duration of low light on a mixed tropical seagrass assemblage. Mixed assemblages of three commonly co-occurring Indo-West Pacific seagrasses, Cymodocea serrulata, Halodule uninervis and Halophila ovalis were grown in climate-controlled tanks, where replicate pots were subjected to a gradient in light availability (0.9–21.6 mols PAR m −2 day −1 ) for 12 weeks. Increased shading resulted in declines in growth and changes in cellular and photosynthesis responses for all species, although time-scale and magnitude of response were species-specific. Applying management criteria (e.g. thresholds) relevant to one species may under- or over-estimate potential for impact on other species and the meadow as a whole. Highlights: Existing mitigations for human-induced light reduction may not be appropriate for diverse seagrass assemblages. To improve our understanding of impact predictions, a multi-species approach was tested, measuring 16 response variables. Shading altered growth, morphology and photosynthesis, although time-scale and magnitude of response were species-specific. Applying management criteria relevant to one species may not represent the potential for impact on a mixed assemblage.