Correlation between pedicle size and the rate of pedicle screw misplacement in the treatment of thoracic fractures: Can we predict how difficult the task will be?. (4th July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Correlation between pedicle size and the rate of pedicle screw misplacement in the treatment of thoracic fractures: Can we predict how difficult the task will be?. (4th July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Correlation between pedicle size and the rate of pedicle screw misplacement in the treatment of thoracic fractures: Can we predict how difficult the task will be?
- Authors:
- Gonzalvo, Augusto
Fitt, Gregory
Liew, Susan
de la Harpe, David
Vrodos, Nikitas
McDonald, Matthew
Rogers, Myron A.
Wilde, Peter H. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Study Design. A retrospective study. Objective. To correlate the incidence of pedicle-screw (PS) misplacement with the dimensions of the pedicles in the treatment of thoracic spine fractures. Summary of background data . The technical challenge of internal fixation with PS in the thoracic spine has been well documented in the literature. However, there are no publications that document the correlation between the pedicle dimensions of the thoracic vertebrae in the preoperative computed tomography scans (CT) and the rate of PS misplacement. Methods . All patients who had PSs inserted between the T1 and T12 vertebrae during a 24-month period were included in this study. PS position was assessed on high quality CT scans by two independent observers and classified in 2 categories: correct or misplaced. The transverse diameter, craniocaudal diameter and cross-sectional area of the pedicles from T1 to T12 were measured in the pre-operative CT. Results . During the period of this study 36 patients underwent internal fixation with 218 PS. Of the 218 screws, 184 (84.5%) were correct and 34 (15.5%) were misplaced. Misplacement rate was 33% for pedicles with a transverse diameter less than 5 mm, 10.7% for those with a transverse diameter between 5 and 7 mm and 0% for those with a transverse diameter larger than 7 mm. There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of PS misplacement in pedicles with transverse diameter smaller than 5 mm compared with the others.Abstract: Study Design. A retrospective study. Objective. To correlate the incidence of pedicle-screw (PS) misplacement with the dimensions of the pedicles in the treatment of thoracic spine fractures. Summary of background data . The technical challenge of internal fixation with PS in the thoracic spine has been well documented in the literature. However, there are no publications that document the correlation between the pedicle dimensions of the thoracic vertebrae in the preoperative computed tomography scans (CT) and the rate of PS misplacement. Methods . All patients who had PSs inserted between the T1 and T12 vertebrae during a 24-month period were included in this study. PS position was assessed on high quality CT scans by two independent observers and classified in 2 categories: correct or misplaced. The transverse diameter, craniocaudal diameter and cross-sectional area of the pedicles from T1 to T12 were measured in the pre-operative CT. Results . During the period of this study 36 patients underwent internal fixation with 218 PS. Of the 218 screws, 184 (84.5%) were correct and 34 (15.5%) were misplaced. Misplacement rate was 33% for pedicles with a transverse diameter less than 5 mm, 10.7% for those with a transverse diameter between 5 and 7 mm and 0% for those with a transverse diameter larger than 7 mm. There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of PS misplacement in pedicles with transverse diameter smaller than 5 mm compared with the others. Also, those with transverse diameter between 5.1 and 7 mm compared with those bigger than 7 mm in diameter. The rate of PS misplacement was higher between T3 and T9 (p < 0.05), which in turn correlated with pedicle transverse diameter. Conclusion. The rate of PS misplacement in the mid thoracic spine (T4–T9) is high and correlates with pedicle transverse diameter. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of neurosurgery. Volume 29:Number 4(2015:Aug.)
- Journal:
- British journal of neurosurgery
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Number 4(2015:Aug.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 4 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0029-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 508
- Page End:
- 512
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07-04
- Subjects:
- posterior spinal instrumentation -- prediction of outcome -- spinal tumour -- thoracic spine -- trauma
Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.48 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/loi/bjn ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ibjn20/current ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3109/02688697.2015.1019414 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0268-8697
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2311.940000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11551.xml