Towards improved governance for sustainable solid waste management in Lebanon: Centralised vs decentralised approaches. Issue 7 (July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Massoud, May A; Mokbel, Michel; Alawieh, Suheir; Yassin, Nasser
• Is Part Of: Waste management & research. Volume 37:Issue 7(2019:Jul.)
• Page Start: 686
• Page End: 697
• Publication Date: 2019-07
• Subjects: Decentralisation -- centralisation -- solid waste -- management -- challenges -- prospects; Factory and trade waste -- Periodicals; Refuse and refuse disposal -- Periodicals; Municipal engineering -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Périodiques; Déchets -- Élimination -- Périodiques; Génie urbain -- Périodiques; 628
• DOI: 10.1177/0734242X19836705
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0734-242X

Abstract

Solid waste management is a multifaceted task that incorporates a diverse set of shareholders and operations. To create a sustainable solid waste management system, governments should select the most advantageous organisational structure, given a country's current setting; contextualising the sector's administrative structure in accordance with a nation's organisational constraints. This research aimed to determine the recommended level of administrative and financial decentralisation for each solid waste management operation and explore the susceptibilities and prospects of each level of governance in Lebanon. Primary data was gathered from environmental experts and concerned organisations using a semi-structured in-depth interview. Results revealed that the optimal model for solid waste management in the case of Lebanon incurs devolving collection, which would assimilate local populations into the decision-making process and reduce opposition towards devised solid waste management plans. Delegation and the construction of centralised treatment facilities is recommended as it incentivises municipal cooperation and permits the installation of methodologies and technologies that reflect the limitations, public attitudes, and waste dynamics of each distinct geographical territory. Deconcentrating disposal would limit the number of landfills constructed and facilitate monitoring. Administrative and constitutional reformations that clearly define the roles and responsibilities of public agencies would reduce the influence of the central authority on peripheral states. The establishment of municipal cooperation models would diminish regional economic disparities by enhancing the level of communication and collaboration between subnational bodies. The performance of decentralised strategies should be continuously monitored to ensure that local administrators are held accountable.