Alternative diagnostic criteria for idiopathic hypersomnia: A 32‐hour protocol. Issue 2 (9th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Evangelista, Elisa; Lopez, Régis; Barateau, Lucie; Chenini, Sofiene; Bosco, Adriana; Jaussent, Isabelle; Dauvilliers, Yves
• Is Part Of: Annals of neurology. Volume 83:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 235
• Page End: 247
• Publication Date: 2018-02-09
• Subjects: Neurology -- Periodicals; Pediatric neurology -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1002/ana.25141
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0364-5134

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To assess the diagnostic value of extended sleep duration on a controlled 32‐hour bed rest protocol in idiopathic hypersomnia (IH). Methods: One hundred sixteen patients with high suspicion of IH (37 clear‐cut IH according to multiple sleep latency test criteria and 79 probable IH), 32 with hypersomnolence associated with a comorbid disorder (non‐IH), and 21 controls underwent polysomnography, modified sleep latency tests, and a 32‐hour bed rest protocol. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to find optimal total sleep time (TST) cutoff values on various periods that discriminate patients from controls. Results: TST was longer in patients with clear‐cut IH than other groups (probable IH, non‐IH, and controls) and in patients with probable IH than non‐IH and controls. The TST cutoff best discriminating clear‐cut IH and controls was 19 hours for the 32‐hour recording (sensitivity = 91.9%, specificity = 85.7%) and 12 hours (100%, 85.7%) for the first 24 hours. The 19‐hour cutoff displayed a specificity and sensitivity of 91.9% and 81.2% between IH and non‐IH patients. Patients with IH above the 19‐hour cutoff were overweight, had more sleep inertia, and had higher TST on all periods compared to patients below 19 hours, whereas no differences were found for the 12‐hour cutoff. An inverse correlation was found between the mean sleep latency and TST during 32‐hour recording in IH patients. Interpretation: In standardized and controlled stringent conditions, the optimal cutoff best discriminating patients from controls was 19 hours over 32 hours, allowing a clear‐cut phenotypical characterization of major interest for research purposes. Sleepier patients on the multiple sleep latency test were also the more severe in terms of extended sleep. Ann Neurol 2018;83:235–247