Interrater and Intrarater Agreement in Neonatal Electroencephalogram Background Scoring. Issue 1 (January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Massey, Shavonne L.; Shou, Haochang; Clancy, Robert; DiGiovine, Marissa; Fitzgerald, Mark P.; Fung, France W.; Farrar, John; Abend, Nicholas S.
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical neurophysiology. Volume 36:Issue 1(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-01
• Subjects: Neonatal -- Electroencephalogram -- Interrater agreement -- Intrarater agreement; Electroencephalography -- Periodicals; Neurophysiology -- Periodicals; Electroencephalography -- Periodicals; Electroencephalography; Periodicals; 612.805
• DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000534
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0736-0258

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Many neonates undergo electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring to identify and manage acute symptomatic seizures. Information about brain function contained in the EEG background data may also help predict neurobehavioral outcomes. For EEG background features to be useful as prognostic indicators, the interpretation of these features must be standardized across electroencephalographers. We aimed at determining the interrater and intrarater agreement among electroencephalographers interpreting neonatal EEG background patterns. Methods: Five neonatal electroencephalographers reviewed 5-to-7.5-minute epochs of EEG from full-term neonates who underwent continuous conventional EEG monitoring. The EEG assessment tool used to classify background patterns was based on the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's guideline for neonatal EEG terminology. Interrater and intrarater agreement were measured using Kappa coefficients. Results: Interrater agreement was consistently highest for voltage (binary: substantial, kappa = 0.783; categorical: moderate, kappa = 0.562), seizure presence (fair–substantial; kappa = 0.375–0.697), continuity (moderate; kappa = 0.481), burst voltage (moderate; kappa = 0.574), suppressed background presence (moderate–substantial; kappa = 0.493–0.643), delta activity presence (fair–moderate; kappa = 0.369–0.432), theta activity presence (fair–moderate; kappa = 0.347–0.600), presence of graphoelements (fair; kappa = 0.381), and overall impression (binary: moderate, kappa = 0.495; categorical: fair–moderate, kappa = 0.347, 0.465). Agreement was poor or inconsistent for all other patterns. Intrarater agreement was variable, with highest average agreement for voltage (binary: substantial, kappa = 0.75; categorical: substantial, kappa = 0.714) and highest consistent agreement for continuity (moderate–substantial; kappa = 0.43–0.67) and overall impression (moderate–substantial; kappa = 0.42–0.68). Conclusions: This study demonstrates substantial variability in neonatal EEG background interpretation across electroencephalographers, indicating a need for educational and technological strategies aimed at improving performance. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.