Motion Necessary to Achieve Mallet Internal Rotation Positions in Children With Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy. Issue 1 (January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Russo, Stephanie A.; Kozin, Scott H.; Zlotolow, Dan A.; Nicholson, Kristen F.; Richards, James G.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric orthopaedics. Volume 39:Issue 1(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-01
• Subjects: scapulothoracic glenohumeral motion -- brachial plexus palsy -- Erb palsy -- Apley scratch test -- extension -- hand to spine -- internal rotation; Pediatric orthopedics -- Periodicals; 618.927
• DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0271-6798

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Upper extremity function in children with brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) is assessed with clinical tests such as the Mallet classification, which uses a hand to spine position to assess shoulder internal rotation, or the modified Mallet classification, which adds an additional internal rotation task (hand to belly). Children with BPBP frequently have difficulty performing the hand to spine task. This study compared scapulothoracic and glenohumeral (GH) parameters associated with successful completion of the hand to spine and hand to belly modified Mallet positions. Methods: Motion capture measurement of 32 children with BPBP was performed in hand on spine, internal rotation (hand to belly), hand to mouth, and maximal humerothoracic extension positions. Modified Mallet scores were determined by a hand surgeon. Results: Children with better hand to spine performance demonstrated significantly greater GH extension and a nonsignificant trend toward increased GH internal rotation compared with children with scores <3. Children with better internal rotation position performance demonstrated significantly greater GH internal rotation and no significant difference in GH extension. Hand on spine and internal rotation Mallet scores moderately correlated (Pearson r =0.469); however, 54% of children who could place their palms flat on their bellies could not reach behind their backs. Conclusions: Successfully reaching behind one's back requires both internal rotation and extension, representing a multiplanar motion. The hand to belly performance is less affected by extension and should be considered for internal rotation assessment, particularly for children undergoing surgical intervention that may affect internal rotation. Level of Evidence: Level II. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.