Effects of copper on olfactory, behavioral, and other sublethal responses of saltwater organisms: Are estimated chronic limits using the biotic ligand model protective?. (6th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: DeForest, David K.; Gensemer, Robert W.; Gorsuch, Joseph W.; Meyer, Joseph S.; Santore, Robert C.; Shephard, Burt K.; Zodrow, Jean M.
• Is Part Of: Environmental toxicology and chemistry. Volume 37:Number 6(2018)
• Page Start: 1515
• Page End: 1522
• Publication Date: 2018-04-06
• Subjects: Biotic ligand model -- Dissolved organic carbon -- Bioavailability -- Behavioral toxicology -- Mytilus edulis -- Estimated chronic limits; Pollution -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Environmental chemistry -- Periodicals; 615.902
• DOI: 10.1002/etc.4112
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0730-7268

Abstract

Abstract: There is concern over whether regulatory criteria for copper (Cu) are protective against chemosensory and behavioral impairment in aquatic organisms. We compiled Cu toxicity data for these and other sublethal endpoints in 35 tests with saltwater organisms and compared the Cu toxicity thresholds with biotic ligand model (BLM)–based estimated chronic limits (ECL values, which are 20% effect concentrations [EC20s] for the embryo‐larval life stage of the blue mussel [ Mytilus edulis ], a saltwater species sensitive to Cu that has historically been used to derive saltwater Cu criteria). Only 8 of the 35 tests had sufficient toxicity and chemistry data to support unequivocal conclusions (i.e., a Cu EC20 or no‐observed‐effect concentration could be derived, and Cu and dissolved organic carbon [DOC] concentrations were measured [or DOC concentrations could be inferred from the test‐water source]). The BLM‐based ECL values would have been protective (i.e., the ECL was lower than the toxicity threshold) in 7 of those 8 tests. In the remaining 27 tests, this meta‐analysis was limited by several factors, including 1) the Cu toxicity threshold was a "less than" value in 19 tests because only a lowest‐observed‐effect concentration could be calculated and 2) Cu and/or DOC concentrations often were not measured. In 2 of those 27 tests, the ECL would not have been protective if based only on a conservatively high upper‐bound DOC estimate. To facilitate future evaluations of the protectiveness of aquatic life criteria for metals, we urge researchers to measure and report exposure‐water chemistry and test‐metal concentrations that bracket regulatory criteria. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:1515–1522. © 2018 SETAC