An Extended Semianalytical Approach for Thermoelasticity of Monoclinic Crystals: Application to Diopside. Issue 9 (26th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zou, Fan; Wu, Zhongqing; Wang, Wenzhong; Wentzcovitch, Renata M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 123:Issue 9(2018)
• Page Start: 7629
• Page End: 7643
• Publication Date: 2018-09-26
• Subjects: first‐principles calculations -- equation of state -- mantle composition -- elasticity -- upper mantle -- lattice dynamics; Geomagnetism -- Periodicals; Geochemistry -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; Earth sciences -- Periodicals; 551.1
• DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016102
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9313

Abstract

Abstract: Here we extend a semianalytical method to compute thermoelastic properties of materials (Wu & Wentzcovitch, 2011 ) to monoclinic systems and apply it to diopside (MgCaSi2 O6 ), a mineral with monoclinic symmetry and an end‐member of clinopyroxene. Using ab initio results for structural and vibrational properties, we obtain the density, the elastic tensor, single crystal elastic anisotropies, and seismic wave velocities of diopside over a wide pressure and temperature range. Our results agree well with previous available experimental results. Compared with other minerals in the upper mantle, clinopyroxene has the lowest P wave velocity ( V P ) and S wave velocity ( V S ) at depths greater than 240 km. Combining our results with elastic properties of other major upper‐mantle minerals obtained by previous studies, we estimate the density and wave velocity profiles of a pyrolitic mantle in the depth range of 220–400 km, where pyroxene is gradually dissolved into garnet. The obtained profiles agree well with seismic models (PREM and AK135) supporting the notion of a pyrolitic upper mantle. Key Points: A semianalytical method is extended to calculate thermoelasticity of monoclinic crystals Diopside has large elastic anisotropies in the upper mantle The density, V P, and V S of pyrolite model in depth range of 220–400 km agree well with PREM and AK135 models supporting the notation of pyrolitic upper mantle