Is Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair Strength Dependent on the Tunnel Angle?. Issue 6 (6th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bronsnick, Daniel; Pastor, Andrew; Peresada, Dmitriy; Amirouche, Farid; Solitro, Giovanni Francesco; Goldberg, Benjamin A.
• Is Part Of: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. Volume 7:Issue 6(2019:Jun.)Supplement 4
• Publication Date: 2019-06-06
• Subjects: transosseous repair -- rotator cuff -- arthroscopic -- biomechanics of bone -- bone tunnels; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Arthroscopy -- Periodicals; Arthroplasty -- Periodicals; Knee -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.7
• DOI: 10.1177/2325967119848667
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2325-9671

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have aimed to biomechanically improve the transosseous tunnel technique of rotator cuff repair. However, no previous work has addressed tunnel inclination at the time of surgery as an influence on the strength of the repair construct. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the tunnel angle and entry point would influence the biomechanical strength of the transosseous tunnel in rotator cuff repair. Additionally, we investigated how tunnel length and bone quality affect the strength of the repair construct. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Mechanical testing was performed on 10 cadaveric humeri. Variations in the bone tunnel angle were imposed in the supraspinatus footprint to create lateral tunnels with inclinations of 30°, 45°, and 90° relative to the longitudinal axis of the humeral shaft. A closed loop of suture was passed through the bone tunnel, and cyclic loading was applied until failure of the construct. Load to failure and distance between entry points were the dependent variables. Analysis of variance, post hoc paired t tests, and the Bonferroni correction were used to analyze the relationship between the tunnel angle and failure load. The Pearson correlation coefficient was then used to evaluate the correlation of the distance between entry points to the ultimate failure load, and t tests were used to compare failure loads between healthy and osteoporotic bone. Results: Tunnels drilled perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis (90°) achieved the highest mean failure load (167.51 ± 48.35 N). However, there were no significant differences in the failure load among the 3 tested inclinations. Tunnels drilled perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis (90°) measured 13.86 ± 1.35 mm between entry points and were significantly longer ( P = .03) than the tunnels drilled at 30° and 45°. We found no correlation of the distance between entry points and the ultimate failure load. Within the scope of this study, we could not identify a significant effect of bone quality on failure load. Conclusion: The tunnel angle does not influence the strength of the bone-suture interface in the transosseous rotator cuff repair construct. Clinical Relevance: The transosseous technique has gained popularity in recent years, given its arthroscopic use. These findings suggest that surgeons should not focus on the tunnel angle as they seek to maximize repair strength.