A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Assessing Body Image Disturbance in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. (June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ellis, Mark A.; Sterba, Katherine R.; Brennan, Emily A.; Maurer, Stacey; Hill, Elizabeth G.; Day, Terry A.; Graboyes, Evan M.
• Is Part Of: Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery. Volume 160:Number 6(2019)
• Page Start: 941
• Page End: 954
• Publication Date: 2019-06
• Subjects: systematic review -- head and neck cancer -- body image disturbance -- patient reported outcome measures; Head -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Neck -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; 617.51
• DOI: 10.1177/0194599819829018
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0194-5998

Abstract

Objective: To synthesize published literature describing the severity of body image disturbance (BID) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) over time, its psychosocial and functional associations, and treatment strategies as assessed by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Data Source: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Review Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature was performed to identify studies of BID in patients with HNC using psychometrically validated PROMs to assess (1) severity of BID over time, (2) psychosocial and functional associations, and (3) management strategies. Results: A total of 17 studies met inclusion criteria. BID was assessed via 10 different PROMs, none of which were HNC-specific measures of BID. Two of 2 longitudinal studies (100%) reported that BID improved from pretreatment to posttreatment, and 2 of 3 longitudinal studies (67%) showed that the severity of BID decreased over time as survivors got further out from treatment. Seven of 17 studies (41%) described negative functional and psychosocial associations with BID, although study methodology limited conclusions about cause and effect. None of the studies assessing interventions to manage BID (0/2, 0%) demonstrated an improvement in BID relative to control. Conclusion: BID in patients with HNC has negative functional and psychosocial associations and lacks evidence-based treatment. Research is limited by the lack of an HNC-specific BID PROM. Further research should address knowledge gaps related to the lack of an HNC-specific BID PROM, longitudinal course of BID in patients with HNC, confusion with regards to risk factors and outcomes, and lack of prevention and treatment strategies.