Unsolicited Patient Complaints among Otolaryngologists. (May 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Unsolicited Patient Complaints among Otolaryngologists. (May 2019)
- Main Title:
- Unsolicited Patient Complaints among Otolaryngologists
- Authors:
- Nassiri, Ashley M.
Pichert, James W.
Domenico, Henry J.
Galloway, Mitchell B.
Cooper, William O.
Bennett, Marc L. - Abstract:
- Objectives: To analyze unsolicited patient complaints (UPCs) among otolaryngologists, identify risk factors for UPCs, and determine the impact of physician feedback on subsequent UPCs. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed UPCs associated with US otolaryngologists from 140 medical practices from 2014 to 2017. A subset of otolaryngologists with high UPCs received peer-comparative feedback and was monitored for changes. Results: The study included 29, 778 physicians, of whom 548 were otolaryngologists. UPCs described concerns with treatment (45%), communication (19%), accessibility (18%), concern for patients and families (10%), and billing (8%). Twenty-nine (5.3%) otolaryngologists were associated with 848 of 3659 (23.2%) total UPCs. Male sex and graduation from a US medical school were statistically significantly associated with an increased number of UPCs ( P = .0070 and P = .0036, respectively). Twenty-nine otolaryngologists with UPCs at or above the 95th percentile received peer-comparative feedback. The intervention led to an overall decrease in the number of UPCs following intervention ( P = .049). Twenty otolaryngologists (69%) categorized as "responders" reduced the number of complaints an average of 45% in the first 2 years following intervention. Discussion: Physician demographic data can be used to identify otolaryngologists with a greater number of UPCs. Most commonly, UPCs expressed concern regarding treatment. Peer-delivered, comparative feedback can beObjectives: To analyze unsolicited patient complaints (UPCs) among otolaryngologists, identify risk factors for UPCs, and determine the impact of physician feedback on subsequent UPCs. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed UPCs associated with US otolaryngologists from 140 medical practices from 2014 to 2017. A subset of otolaryngologists with high UPCs received peer-comparative feedback and was monitored for changes. Results: The study included 29, 778 physicians, of whom 548 were otolaryngologists. UPCs described concerns with treatment (45%), communication (19%), accessibility (18%), concern for patients and families (10%), and billing (8%). Twenty-nine (5.3%) otolaryngologists were associated with 848 of 3659 (23.2%) total UPCs. Male sex and graduation from a US medical school were statistically significantly associated with an increased number of UPCs ( P = .0070 and P = .0036, respectively). Twenty-nine otolaryngologists with UPCs at or above the 95th percentile received peer-comparative feedback. The intervention led to an overall decrease in the number of UPCs following intervention ( P = .049). Twenty otolaryngologists (69%) categorized as "responders" reduced the number of complaints an average of 45% in the first 2 years following intervention. Discussion: Physician demographic data can be used to identify otolaryngologists with a greater number of UPCs. Most commonly, UPCs expressed concern regarding treatment. Peer-delivered, comparative feedback can be effective in reducing UPCs in high-risk otolaryngologists. Implications for Practice: Systematic monitoring and respectful sharing of peer-comparative patient complaint data offers an intervention associated with UPCs and concomitant malpractice risk reduction. Collegial feedback over time increases the response rate, but a small proportion of physicians will require directive interventions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery. Volume 160:Number 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 160:Number 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 160, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 160
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0160-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 810
- Page End:
- 817
- Publication Date:
- 2019-05
- Subjects:
- patient complaints -- otolaryngology -- patient safety -- quality improvement -- malpractice risk -- peer-comparative feedback
Head -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Neck -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Otolaryngology -- Periodicals
617.51 - Journal URLs:
- http://oto.sagepub.com/content/by/year ↗
http://online.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.mosby.com/oto ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01945998 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0194599818823706 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0194-5998
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6313.523000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11503.xml