A mixed-integer programming approach for locating jamming devices in a flow-jamming attack. (July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vadlamani, Satish; Schweitzer, David; Medal, Hugh; Nandi, Apurba; Eksioglu, Burak
• Is Part Of: Computers & operations research. Volume 95(2018)
• Page Start: 83
• Page End: 96
• Publication Date: 2018-07
• Subjects: OR In telecommunications -- OR In defense -- Flow-jamming attacks -- Jamming device placement problem -- Benders' decomposition; Operations research -- Periodicals; Electronic digital computers -- Periodicals; 004.05
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2018.02.020
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-0548

Abstract

Highlights: Optimal locations for placing jamming devices in flow-jamming attacks is modeled. A Benders decomposition algorithm is implemented to solve the problem. Acceleration techniques for Benders decomposition outperform CPLEX. Number of locations for jammer placement accuracy quickly reaches diminishing returns. 10% extra power through additional jammers shows nearly increase in jamming impact. Abstract: The ubiquitous nature of wireless networks makes them increasingly prone to jamming attacks as such attacks become more sophisticated. In this paper, we seek to gain understanding about a particular type of jamming attack: the flow-jamming attack. Toward this end, we provide a mixed-integer programming model for optimizing the location of jamming devices for flow-jamming attacks. An accelerated Benders' decomposition approach was used to solve the model. We solved the problem for two realistic networks and 18 randomly generated networks and found that the Benders' approach was computationally faster than CPLEX for nearly all the problem instances, particularly for larger problems with 1440 binary variables. The experimental results show that optimally locating jamming devices can increase the impact of flow-jamming attacks. Specifically, as the number of possible locations increases the jammers' efficacy increases as well, but there is a clear point of diminishing returns. Also, adding lower-powered jammers to work in conjunction with higher powered jammers significantly increases overall efficacy in spite of the power difference.