Clinical and radiologic outcomes following resection of primary proximal fibula tumors: Proximal fibula resection outcomes. (25th March 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Clinical and radiologic outcomes following resection of primary proximal fibula tumors: Proximal fibula resection outcomes. (25th March 2019)
- Main Title:
- Clinical and radiologic outcomes following resection of primary proximal fibula tumors: Proximal fibula resection outcomes
- Authors:
- Arikan, Yavuz
Misir, Abdulhamit
Gur, Volkan
Kizkapan, Turan Bilge
Dincel, Yasar Mahsut
Akman, Yunus Emre - Abstract:
- Purpose: Reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and biceps femoris tendon following proximal fibula resection is controversial. Postoperative knee instability and peroneal nerve dysfunction affect outcome. This study aimed to determine functional, clinical, and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent en bloc proximal fibula resections and to compare clinical and radiological instability rates for primary repair after type I and type II resections. Materials and Methods: Eleven patients with primary tumors of the proximal fibula were included. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and Lysholm knee score were used in the evaluation of functional outcomes. Clinical outcome was assessed using knee range of motion and knee varus stress test. Radiological outcome was assessed using varus stress knee radiographs. Knee stability was evaluated using the varus stress test at 30° of knee flexion and varus stress knee radiographs and graded in millimeters. Results: Of the 11 tumors, 6 (54.6%) underwent type I resection. In five (45.4%) patients, type II resection was performed. The mean follow-up period was 32 ± 13.9 months (range, 12–55 months; median, 27 months). The mean knee joint lateral opening, MSTS score, and Lysholm knee score with type I versus type II resection were 5.7 ± 1.2 mm versus 6.4 ± 1.1 mm ( p = 0.247), 28.7 ± 1.8 (95.6%) versus 20.4 ± 7.7 (68%) ( p = 0.011), and 92.2 ± 8.8 versus 62.8 ± 20.4 ( p = 0.026), respectively. PostoperativePurpose: Reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and biceps femoris tendon following proximal fibula resection is controversial. Postoperative knee instability and peroneal nerve dysfunction affect outcome. This study aimed to determine functional, clinical, and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent en bloc proximal fibula resections and to compare clinical and radiological instability rates for primary repair after type I and type II resections. Materials and Methods: Eleven patients with primary tumors of the proximal fibula were included. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and Lysholm knee score were used in the evaluation of functional outcomes. Clinical outcome was assessed using knee range of motion and knee varus stress test. Radiological outcome was assessed using varus stress knee radiographs. Knee stability was evaluated using the varus stress test at 30° of knee flexion and varus stress knee radiographs and graded in millimeters. Results: Of the 11 tumors, 6 (54.6%) underwent type I resection. In five (45.4%) patients, type II resection was performed. The mean follow-up period was 32 ± 13.9 months (range, 12–55 months; median, 27 months). The mean knee joint lateral opening, MSTS score, and Lysholm knee score with type I versus type II resection were 5.7 ± 1.2 mm versus 6.4 ± 1.1 mm ( p = 0.247), 28.7 ± 1.8 (95.6%) versus 20.4 ± 7.7 (68%) ( p = 0.011), and 92.2 ± 8.8 versus 62.8 ± 20.4 ( p = 0.026), respectively. Postoperative complications of all patients included one (9.1%) deep tissue infection and one (9.1%) long-term knee instability. In one patient (9.1%) who underwent type II resection, above-the-knee amputation was performed after local recurrence. Conclusions: Primary repair of the LCL and biceps femoris tendon to the surrounding soft tissues after resection of proximal fibular tumors provides good clinical outcomes. Primary repair is a simple technique to perform with minimal morbidity. Peroneal nerve palsy was a problem, especially in type II resections. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of orthopaedic surgery. Volume 27:Number 2(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of orthopaedic surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 27:Number 2(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 27, Issue 2 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0027-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03-25
- Subjects:
- instability -- outcome -- primary repair -- proximal fibula -- resection -- tumor
Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals
Orthopedics
Orthopedic surgery
Periodicals
617.3 - Journal URLs:
- https://journals.sagepub.com/home/OSJ ↗
http://www.josonline.org/index.php/JOS ↗
https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/journal-of-orthopaedic-surgery/journal202601 ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/2309499019837411 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1022-5536
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11497.xml