The utility of routine clinical 12-lead ECG in assessing eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator. (1st November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thomas, Jason A.; Perez-Alday, Erick Andres; Hamilton, Christopher; Kabir, Muammar M.; Park, Eugene A.; Tereshchenko, Larisa G.
• Is Part Of: Computers in biology and medicine. Volume 102(2018)
• Page Start: 242
• Page End: 250
• Publication Date: 2018-11-01
• Subjects: Subcutaneous ICD -- Electrocardiogram -- Eligibility; Medicine -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Biology -- Data processing -- Periodicals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0010-4825

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is a life-saving device. Recording of a specialized 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is required for S-ICD eligibility assessment. The goals of this study were: (1) evaluate the effect of ECG filtering on S-ICD eligibility, and (2) simplify S-ICD eligibility assessment by development of an S-ICD ineligibility prediction tool, which utilizes the widely available routine 12-lead ECG. Methods and results: Prospective cross-sectional study participants [n = 68; 54% male; 94% white, with wide ranges of age (18–81 y), body mass index (19–53), QRS duration (66–150 ms), and left ventricular ejection fraction (37–77%)] underwent 12-lead supine, 3-lead supine and standing ECG recording. All 3-lead ECG recordings were assessed using the standard S-ICD pre-implantation ECG morphology screening. Backward, stepwise, logistic regression was used to build a model for 12-lead prediction of S-ICD eligibility. Select electrocardiogram waves and complexes: QRS, R-, S, and T-amplitudes on all 12 leads, averaged QT interval, QRS duration, and R/T ratio in the lead with the largest T wave (R/Tmax ) were included as predictors. The effect of ECG filtering on ECG morphology was evaluated. A total of 9 participants (13%) failed S-ICD screening prior to filtering. Filtering at 3–40 Hz, similar to the S-ICD default, reduced S-ICD ineligibility to 4%. A regression model that included RII, SII-aVL, TI, II, aVL, aVF, V3-V6, and R/Tmax perfectly predicted S-ICD eligibility, with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of 1.0. Conclusion: Routine clinical 12-lead ECG can be used to predict S-ICD eligibility. ECG filtering may improve S-ICD eligibility. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Electrocardiogram filtering at 3–40 Hz improves S-ICD eligibility threefold. Filtering (3–40 Hz and 9–40 Hz) reduces both T-wave and QRS complex amplitudes. Body habitus and anthropometrics do not affect S-ICD eligibility. The 12-lead electrocardiogram predicts S-ICD eligibility. The primary vector fails screening more often in standing than in supine position.