Rice-duck co-culture for reducing negative impacts of biogas slurry application in rice production systems. (1st May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Haishui; Yu, Degui; Zhou, Jiajia; Zhai, Silong; Bian, Xinmin; Weih, Martin
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental management. Volume 213(2018)
• Page Start: 142
• Page End: 150
• Publication Date: 2018-05-01
• Subjects: Nutrient loss -- Ecological recycling agriculture -- Fertilizer -- Agroecosystem -- Irrigated rice production; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 363.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.077
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-4797

Abstract

Abstract: Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) losses are a potential limitation for the direct application of biogas slurry as a substitute for chemical fertilizer in irrigated rice production systems. The hypothesis was tested that a rice-duck co-culture promotes the rice N and P use efficiencies, reducing the losses of these nutrient elements through run-offs and enabling the use of biogas slurry as a substitute for chemical fertilizers. A field split-plot experiment was carried out to test the hypothesis. Our results showed that the direct application of biogas slurry was harmful for rice production. Compared with rice monoculture under chemical fertilization, biogas slurry application reduced N and P accumulation in grains, P use efficiency, and grain yield by 3.6%, 7.8%, 12.7%, and 14.8%, respectively, but increased the total N and P concentrations in the surface water 1.4- and 2.7-fold, respectively, on average on the eleventh day after fertilization. However, rice-duck co-culture compensated for the negative effects of biogas slurry on rice production. Under the biogas slurry application and in line with our hypothesis, the rice-duck co-culture significantly increased N and P accumulation and use efficiencies, as well as grain yield to levels similar to those acquired with chemical fertilization treatments. Meanwhile, total N and P concentrations were significantly lower for rice-duck co-culture than those of rice monoculture under biogas slurry application. Our results suggest that rice-duck co-culture can maintain rice yield and reduce the risks of N and P loss to local environments when utilizing biogas slurry as a substitute for chemical fertilizers. Highlights: We estimated the suitability of biogas slurry instituting for chemical fertilizer. Rice-duck farming increases nitrogen uptake under biogas slurry use. Rice-duck farming promotes phosphorus uptake under biogas slurry use. Rice-duck farming reduces nitrogen and phosphorus loss after biogas slurry use. Biogas slurry can be a substitute for chemical fertilizer under rice-duck farming.