Detection of recurrent brain tumors in children: No significant difference in sensitivity between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI. Issue 4 (August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bouzidi, Yasmina; Barteau, Emmanuel; Lejeune, Julien; Dejobert, Maelle; Gravellier, Bastien; Sirinelli, Dominique; Cottier, Jean Philippe; Morel, Baptiste
• Is Part Of: Neuroradiology journal. Volume 32:Issue 4(2019:Aug.)
• Page Start: 259
• Page End: 266
• Publication Date: 2019-08
• Subjects: Brain MRI -- cerebral tumor -- child -- gadolinium -- neoplasm recurrence -- pediatric radiology; Nervous system -- Radiography -- Periodicals; Neuroradiography -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.804757
• DOI: 10.1177/1971400919845619
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1971-4009

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a gadolinium injection is currently used in the follow-up of children in remission of cerebral tumors (CTs). Intracerebral gadolinium deposition has been recently reported with unknown risks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of unenhanced brain MRI (U-MRI) in detection of tumor recurrence. Methods and materials: A set of 58 U-MRIs of children in remission was retrospectively evaluated by three seniors (a neuroradiologist, a pediatric and a general radiologist) and one junior to look for any recurrence. Clinical, tumoral and imaging data were collected. The final diagnosis was anatomopathological when available, or the clinicoradiological evolution. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and interobserver agreement were calculated. A Fisher test and Fleiss kappa coefficient were performed. Results: For the seniors, the U-MRI had a sensitivity of 81% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56–0.90), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82% (95% CI: 0.63–0.94). The U-MRI sensitivity, regardless of the observer, was not significantly different from the contrast-enhanced MRI sensitivity (86%) according to a Fisher test ( p > 0.05). No significant difference in sensitivity within the subgroups was found. The interobserver agreement of seniors was good (κ = 0.68). Conclusion: U-MRI brain was suboptimal for 80% of patients. Three-dimensional millimetric, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and diffusion would constitute helpful sequences in follow-up. Further specific studies depending on each tumor type are still required to determine whether a potential abstention of gadolinium intravenous injection should be discussed for children.