Uses of Population Health Rankings in Local Policy Contexts: A Multisite Case Study. (August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Purtle, Jonathan; Peters, Rachel; Kolker, Jennifer; Diez Roux, Ana V.
• Is Part Of: Medical care research and review. Volume 76:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: 478
• Page End: 496
• Publication Date: 2019-08
• Subjects: population health rankings -- uses of research evidence -- evidence-informed policy making -- qualitative research; Medical care -- United States -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Research -- United States -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Research -- Periodicals; Medical economics -- United States -- Periodicals; Medical economics -- Periodicals; 362.10973
• DOI: 10.1177/1077558717726115
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1077-5587

Abstract

Population health rankings are a common strategy to spur evidence-informed health policy making, but little is known about their uses or impacts. The study aims were to (1) understand how and why the County Health Rankings (CH-Rankings) are used in local policy contexts, (2) identify factors that influence CH-Rankings utilization, and (3) explore potentially negative impacts of the CH-Rankings. Forty-four interviews were conducted with health organization officials and public policy makers in 15 purposively selected counties. The CH-Rankings were used instrumentally to inform internal planning decisions, conceptually to educate the public and policy makers about determinants of population health, and politically to advance organizational agendas. Factors related to organizational capacity, county political ideology, and county rank influenced if, how, and why the CH-Rankings were used. The CH-Rankings sometimes had the negative impacts of promoting potentially ineffective interventions in politically conservative counties and prompting negative media coverage in some counties with poor rank.