Variational study of the interacting, spinless Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model. (11th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yahyavi, M; Saleem, L; Hetényi, B
• Is Part Of: Journal of physics. Volume 30:Number 44(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-10-11
• Subjects: correlated electrons -- topological insulators -- one-dimensional systems; Condensed matter -- Periodicals; Matière condensée -- Périodiques; Vaste stoffen; Vloeistoffen; Natuurkunde; Electronic journals; Computer network resources; 530.4105
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/aae0a4
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0953-8984

Abstract

Abstract: We study the phase diagram and the total polarization distribution of the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model with nearest neighbor interaction in one dimension at half-filling. To obtain the ground state wave-function, we extend the Baeriswyl variational wave function to account for alternating hopping parameters. The ground state energies of the variational wave functions compare well to exact diagonalization results. For the case of uniform hopping for all bonds, where it is known that an ideal conductor to insulator transition takes place at finite interaction, we also find a transition at an interaction strength somewhat lower than the known value. The ideal conductor phase is a Fermi sea. The phase diagram in the whole parameter range shows a resemblance to the phase diagram of the Kane–Mele–Hubbard model. We also calculate the gauge invariant cumulants corresponding to the polarization (Zak phase) and use these to reconstruct the distribution of the polarization. We calculate the reconstructed polarization distribution along a path in parameter space which connects two points with opposite polarization in two ways. In one case we cross the metallic phase line, in the other, we go through only insulating states. In the former case, the average polarization changes discontinuously after passing through the metallic phase line, while in the latter the distribution 'walks across' smoothly from one polarization to its opposite. This state of affairs suggests that the correlation acts to break the chiral symmetry of the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model, in the same way as it happens when a Rice–Mele onsite potential is turned on.