Epidemiology and Changes in Mortality of Sepsis After the Implementation of Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. (September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Epidemiology and Changes in Mortality of Sepsis After the Implementation of Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. (September 2019)
- Main Title:
- Epidemiology and Changes in Mortality of Sepsis After the Implementation of Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines
- Authors:
- Herrán-Monge, Rubén
Muriel-Bombín, Arturo
García-García, Marta M.
Merino-García, Pedro A.
Martínez-Barrios, Miguel
Andaluz, David
Ballesteros, Juan Carlos
Domínguez-Berrot, Ana María
Moradillo-Gonzalez, Susana
Macías, Santiago
Álvarez-Martínez, Braulio
Fernández-Calavia, M. José
Tarancón, Concepción
Villar, Jesús
Blanco, Jesús - Abstract:
- Purpose: To determine the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock after 9 years of the implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and to build a mortality prediction model. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, observational study performed during a 5-month period in 2011 in a network of 11 intensive care units (ICUs). We compared our findings with those obtained in the same ICUs in a study conducted in 2002. Results: The current cohort included 262 episodes of severe sepsis and/or septic shock, and the 2002 cohort included 324. The prevalence was 14% (95% confidence interval: 12.5-15.7) with no differences to 2002. The population-based incidence was 31 cases/100 000 inhabitants/year. Patients in 2011 had a significantly lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II; 21.9 ± 6.6 vs 25.5 ± 7.07), Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (5.6 ± 3.2 vs 6.3 ± 3.6), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores on day 1 (8 ± 3.5 vs 9.6 ± 3.7; P < .01). The main source of infection was intraabdominal (32.5%) although microbiologic isolation was possible in 56.7% of cases. The 2011 cohort had a marked reduction in 48-hour (7% vs 14.8%), ICU (27.2% vs 48.2%), and in-hospital (36.7% vs 54.3%) mortalities. Most relevant factors associated with death were APACHE II score, age, previous immunosuppression and liver insufficiency, alcoholism, nosocomial infection, and Delta SOFA score. Conclusion: Although the incidence ofPurpose: To determine the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock after 9 years of the implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and to build a mortality prediction model. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, observational study performed during a 5-month period in 2011 in a network of 11 intensive care units (ICUs). We compared our findings with those obtained in the same ICUs in a study conducted in 2002. Results: The current cohort included 262 episodes of severe sepsis and/or septic shock, and the 2002 cohort included 324. The prevalence was 14% (95% confidence interval: 12.5-15.7) with no differences to 2002. The population-based incidence was 31 cases/100 000 inhabitants/year. Patients in 2011 had a significantly lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II; 21.9 ± 6.6 vs 25.5 ± 7.07), Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (5.6 ± 3.2 vs 6.3 ± 3.6), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores on day 1 (8 ± 3.5 vs 9.6 ± 3.7; P < .01). The main source of infection was intraabdominal (32.5%) although microbiologic isolation was possible in 56.7% of cases. The 2011 cohort had a marked reduction in 48-hour (7% vs 14.8%), ICU (27.2% vs 48.2%), and in-hospital (36.7% vs 54.3%) mortalities. Most relevant factors associated with death were APACHE II score, age, previous immunosuppression and liver insufficiency, alcoholism, nosocomial infection, and Delta SOFA score. Conclusion: Although the incidence of sepsis/septic shock remained unchanged during a 10-year period, the implementation of the SSC guidelines resulted in a marked decrease in the overall mortality. The lower severity of patients on ICU admission and the reduced early mortality suggest an improvement in early diagnosis, better initial management, and earlier antibiotic treatment. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of intensive care medicine. Volume 34:Number 9(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of intensive care medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 34:Number 9(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 34, Issue 9 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0034-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 740
- Page End:
- 750
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09
- Subjects:
- severe sepsis -- septic shock -- organ failure -- mortality -- epidemiology -- Surviving Sepsis Campaign
Critical care medicine -- Periodicals
Critical Care -- Periodicals
Soins intensifs -- Périodiques
Soins intensifs
Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme)
Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme)
616.02805 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0885-0666;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://jic.sagepub.com ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=jic ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0885066617711882 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0885-0666
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11447.xml