Different responses of predator and prey functional diversity to fragmentation. Issue 7 (20th August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kissick, Ashley L.; Dunning, John B.; Fernandez‐Juricic, Esteban; Holland, Jeffrey D.
• Is Part Of: Ecological applications. Volume 28:Issue 7(2018)
• Page Start: 1853
• Page End: 1866
• Publication Date: 2018-08-20
• Subjects: avian vision -- Cerambycidae -- functional diversity indices -- functional traits -- landscape response -- mapping -- multitrophic -- perceptual modeling -- predation -- three‐dimensional plots -- wood‐boring beetles; Ecology -- Periodicals; Environmental protection -- Periodicals; Biology, Economic -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/eap.1780
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1051-0761

Abstract

Abstract: The study of functional diversity, or the range of species' ecological roles in a community, is a rapidly expanding area in ecology. Given the extent that ecosystems are being altered, effort should shift toward assessing variation in functional diversity across landscapes with the goal of improving land use management decisions. We construct a workflow that creates three‐dimensional surfaces and maps of functional diversity to examine changes in beetle functional diversity across an Indiana, USA landscape. We sampled 105 prey wood‐borer and predator beetle species along a gradient of forest fragmentation across Indiana and used a number of functional traits from literature sources to capture their functional roles. We developed newly measured functional traits to estimate several traits relevant to beetles' ecological function that was unknown and not easily measured. Functional diversity indices (FRic, FDis, FDiv, and FEve) were calculated from species abundance and functional traits and used to assess changes in functional diversity along the fragmentation gradient. We predicted that habitat fragmentation would have a greater negative impact on predator beetle functional diversity than prey wood‐borer functional diversity. Landscape metrics most important to the functional diversity of both wood‐borer and predator beetle communities were landscape division index (LDI, an assessment of landscape subdivision) and mean shape index (MSI, a measure of patch shape complexity). Overall, three‐dimensional surfaces of functional diversity and functional diversity maps across the Indiana landscape revealed that beetle functional diversity was greatest with minimal landscape subdivision. Opposite to what we predicted, we found that the prey wood‐borer functional diversity was more negatively impacted by LDI than the predator beetle functional diversity. Furthermore, predator beetle functional diversity was greater with increasing MSI. The map predicted predator FRic to be highest in forested areas with intact habitat and also less sensitive to habitat fragmentation adjacent to more continuous forest. We propose that land management may be guided by revealing landscapes that are most appropriate for maximizing functional diversity of multiple communities or shifting the relative abundance within prey and beneficial predator beetle functional groups with the use of three‐dimensional plots or maps.