Evaluating the value of intrapartum fetal scalp blood sampling to predict adverse neonatal outcomes: A UK multicentre observational study. (September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluating the value of intrapartum fetal scalp blood sampling to predict adverse neonatal outcomes: A UK multicentre observational study. (September 2019)
- Main Title:
- Evaluating the value of intrapartum fetal scalp blood sampling to predict adverse neonatal outcomes: A UK multicentre observational study
- Authors:
- Al Wattar, Bassel H.
Lakhiani, Aarti
Sacco, Adalina
Siddharth, Aditi
Bain, Alexandra
Calvia, Alexandra
Kamran, Atiyah
Tiong, Bing
Warwick, Bethan
MacMahon, Caroline
Marcus, Diana
Long, Emma
Coyle, Gillian
Lever, Gillian Elizabeth
Michel, Gina
Gopal, Gomathy
Baig, Hana
Price, Hannah Louise
Badri, Hawra
Stevenson, Helen
Hoyte, Helene
Malik, Humaira
Edwards, Jade
Hartley, Jennifer
Hemers, Jennifer
Tamblyn, Jennifer
Dalton, John Alexander William
Frost, Jonathan
Subba, Kamana
Baxter, Kathryn
Sivakumar, Kavitha
Murphy, Kelly
Papadakis, Konstantinos
Bladon, Laura Rachel
Kasaven, Lorraine
Manning, Louisa
Prior, Mathew
Ghosh, Mausumi
Couch, Melanie
Altunel, Melis
Pearce, Melissa
Cocker, Michael
Stephanou, Michael
Jie, Michelle
Mistry, Minesh
Wahby, Mohammed Osama
Saidi, Nabila Shahid
Ramshaw, Nicola Louise
Tempest, Nicola
Parker, Nina
Tan, Phoebe L
Johnson, Racheal Louise
Harris, Rachel
Tildesley, Rachel
Ram, Ramya
Painuly, Ritu
Cuffolo, Romana
Bugeja, Roberta
Ngadze, Rose
Grainger, Rosie
Gurung, Sabitra
Mak, Sammy
Farrell, Sara
Cowey, Sarah
Neary, Sarah
Quinn, Sarah
Nijjar, Simrit Kaur
Kenyon, Sophie
Lamb, Stephanie
Tracey, Susan
Lee, Tara
Kinsella, Therese
Davidson, Trecia
Corr, Trent
Sampson, Uzo
McQueen, Victoria
Smith, William Parry
Castling, Zora
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the value of fetal scalp blood sampling (FBS) as an adjunct test to cardiotocography, to predict adverse neonatal outcomes. Study design: A multicentre service evaluation observational study in forty-four maternity units in the UK. We collected data retrospectively on pregnant women with singleton pregnancy who received FBS in labour using a standardised data collection tool. The primary outcome was prediction of neonatal acidaemia diagnosed as umbilical cord arterial pH < 7.05, the secondary outcomes were the prediction of Apgar scores<7 at 1st and 5th minutes and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We evaluated the correlation between the last FBS blood gas before birth and the umbilical cord blood and adjusted for time intervals. We constructed 2 × 2 tables to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and generated receiver operating curves to report on the Area Under the Curve (AUC). Results: In total, 1422 samples were included in the analysis; pH values showed no correlation (r = 0.001, p = 0.9) in samples obtained within an hour (n = 314), or within half an hour from birth (n = 115) (r=-0.003, p = 0.9). A suboptimal FBS pH value (<7.25) had a poor sensitivity (22%) and PPV (4.9%) to predict neonatal acidaemia with high specificity (87.3%) and NPV (97.4%). Similar performance was noted to predict Apgar scores <7 at 1st (sensitivity 14.5%, specificity 87.5%, PPV 23.4%,Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the value of fetal scalp blood sampling (FBS) as an adjunct test to cardiotocography, to predict adverse neonatal outcomes. Study design: A multicentre service evaluation observational study in forty-four maternity units in the UK. We collected data retrospectively on pregnant women with singleton pregnancy who received FBS in labour using a standardised data collection tool. The primary outcome was prediction of neonatal acidaemia diagnosed as umbilical cord arterial pH < 7.05, the secondary outcomes were the prediction of Apgar scores<7 at 1st and 5th minutes and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We evaluated the correlation between the last FBS blood gas before birth and the umbilical cord blood and adjusted for time intervals. We constructed 2 × 2 tables to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and generated receiver operating curves to report on the Area Under the Curve (AUC). Results: In total, 1422 samples were included in the analysis; pH values showed no correlation (r = 0.001, p = 0.9) in samples obtained within an hour (n = 314), or within half an hour from birth (n = 115) (r=-0.003, p = 0.9). A suboptimal FBS pH value (<7.25) had a poor sensitivity (22%) and PPV (4.9%) to predict neonatal acidaemia with high specificity (87.3%) and NPV (97.4%). Similar performance was noted to predict Apgar scores <7 at 1st (sensitivity 14.5%, specificity 87.5%, PPV 23.4%, NPV 79.6%) and 5th minute (sensitivity 20.3%, specificity 87.4%, PPV 7.6%, NPV 95.6%), and admission to NICU (sensitivity 20.3%, specificity 87.5%, PPV 13.3%, NPV 92.1%). The AUC for FBS pH to predict neonatal acidaemia was 0.59 (95%CI 0.59–0.68, p = 0.3) with similar performance to predict Apgar scores<7 at 1st minute (AUC 0.55, 95%CI 0.51–0.59, p = 0.004), 5th minute (AUC 0.55, 95%CI 0.48–0.62, p = 0.13), and admission to NICU (AUC 0.58, 95%CI 0.52–0.64, p = 0.002). Forty-one neonates had acidaemia (2.8%, 41/1422) at birth. There was no significant correlation in pH values between the FBS and the umbilical cord blood in this subgroup adjusted for sampling time intervals (r = 0.03, p = 0.83). Conclusions: As an adjunct tool to cardiotocography, FBS offered limited value to predict neonatal acidaemia, low Apgar Scores and admission to NICU. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. Volume 240(2019)
- Journal:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
- Issue:
- Volume 240(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 240, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 240
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0240-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 62
- Page End:
- 67
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09
- Subjects:
- Fetal scalp -- Blood sampling -- Intrapartum -- Accuracy -- Acidaemia -- Asphyxia
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Reproductive health -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Reproduction -- Periodicals
Obstétrique -- Périodiques
Gynécologie -- Périodiques
Reproduction -- Périodiques
Verloskunde
Gynaecologie
Voortplanting (biologie)
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Reproduction
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03012115 ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/00282243 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.06.012 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-2115
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.733000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11434.xml