Delayed versus immediate oxytocin infusion after amniotomy for induction of labour: A randomised controlled pilot trial. (September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Delayed versus immediate oxytocin infusion after amniotomy for induction of labour: A randomised controlled pilot trial. (September 2019)
- Main Title:
- Delayed versus immediate oxytocin infusion after amniotomy for induction of labour: A randomised controlled pilot trial
- Authors:
- Titulaer, Linde M.L.
de Wolf, G. Sander
Bakkum, Erica A.
Moll, Etelka - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To get a preliminary understanding of the amniotomy-to-delivery interval, patients' experiences and risks by awaiting spontaneous contractions after amniotomy and to explore the need and feasibility for a larger randomised controlled trial. Methods: We performed a randomised controlled pilot trial in a peripheral teaching hospital in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Women with term, singleton pregnancy in vertex position undergoing labour induction for one of the five following indications: prolonged pregnancy, mild hypertensive disorders, diabetes, expected macrosomia, maternal request, were randomised to amniotomy with 12-hours delayed oxytocin (DO), or amniotomy with immediate oxytocin (IO). Results: A total of 64 women was included in the analysis. The median amniotomy-to-delivery interval for the DO-group was 15 h (IQR 8–21), and 6 h (IQR 5–11) for the IO-group (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24–0.70), with equal patient reported childbirth perception in the overall group ( P =0.43). Parous women reported a significantly less positive perception of labour ( P =0.02) and used pain relief more often (RR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.05–8.19) in the DO-group. The proportion of women delivered within 24 h was not significantly different between groups (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.05–1.83). Other delivery and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups, possibly due to being underpowered. Conclusion: Preliminary results show that amniotomy-to-delivery interval wasAbstract: Objective: To get a preliminary understanding of the amniotomy-to-delivery interval, patients' experiences and risks by awaiting spontaneous contractions after amniotomy and to explore the need and feasibility for a larger randomised controlled trial. Methods: We performed a randomised controlled pilot trial in a peripheral teaching hospital in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Women with term, singleton pregnancy in vertex position undergoing labour induction for one of the five following indications: prolonged pregnancy, mild hypertensive disorders, diabetes, expected macrosomia, maternal request, were randomised to amniotomy with 12-hours delayed oxytocin (DO), or amniotomy with immediate oxytocin (IO). Results: A total of 64 women was included in the analysis. The median amniotomy-to-delivery interval for the DO-group was 15 h (IQR 8–21), and 6 h (IQR 5–11) for the IO-group (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24–0.70), with equal patient reported childbirth perception in the overall group ( P =0.43). Parous women reported a significantly less positive perception of labour ( P =0.02) and used pain relief more often (RR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.05–8.19) in the DO-group. The proportion of women delivered within 24 h was not significantly different between groups (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.05–1.83). Other delivery and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups, possibly due to being underpowered. Conclusion: Preliminary results show that amniotomy-to-delivery interval was prolonged with 9 h in the DO-group, with equal patient reported childbirth perception in the overall group. Parous women have a less positive perception of their delivery and used pain relief more often when oxytocin was delayed. Delaying oxytocin infusion after amniotomy should be further investigated in an adequately powered randomised trial. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. Volume 240(2019)
- Journal:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
- Issue:
- Volume 240(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 240, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 240
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0240-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 357
- Page End:
- 363
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09
- Subjects:
- Labour -- Amniotomy -- Induction -- Oxytocin -- Perception
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Reproductive health -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Reproduction -- Periodicals
Obstétrique -- Périodiques
Gynécologie -- Périodiques
Reproduction -- Périodiques
Verloskunde
Gynaecologie
Voortplanting (biologie)
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Reproduction
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03012115 ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/00282243 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.036 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-2115
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.733000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11434.xml