Virtual surgical planning in fibula free flap head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 9 (September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tang, Nicholas S.J.; Ahmadi, Iraj; Ramakrishnan, Anand
• Is Part Of: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. Volume 72:Issue 9(2019)
• Page Start: 1465
• Page End: 1477
• Publication Date: 2019-09
• Subjects: Head and neck reconstruction -- Operative time -- Ischaemic time -- Orthognathic accuracy -- Virtual surgical planning; Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 617.9505
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1748-6815

Abstract

Summary: Background: The traditional approach to head and neck reconstruction is considered challenging, requiring a subjective assessment of an often-complex defect followed by careful modelling of a bony flap to match this. The introduction of Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) has provided the surgeon with a means to increase efficiency, precision and overall patient outcomes. This study aims to compare VSP and traditional head and neck reconstructions utilising fibula free flaps with regards surgical efficiency and patient outcomes. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed and Medline databases was performed from the date of their inception through to August 2018 to evaluate and compare VSP and non-VSP cohorts in the context of fibula free flap head and neck reconstruction. Primary comparative outcomes included operative and ischaemic time, with secondary outcomes including complications rates, measures of accuracy and financial benefits. Results: One hundred and fifty-three articles were identified. Twenty-three articles were included in the review, comprising a total of 713 patients. VSP was associated with significantly decreased intraoperative time (Standardised Mean Difference -1.01; 95% CI -1.23 to 0.80; p = 0.000) and ischaemic time (Standardised Mean Difference -1.55; 95% CI -1.87 to -1.23, p = 0.002). VSP was also associated with reduced orthognathic deviation from an ideal outcome when compared to conventional techniques. No statistically significant differences in complication rates between conventional and VSP techniques were identified. Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis suggests that VSP confers significant benefits with respect to improved orthognathic accuracy, ischaemic times and intraoperative times without any significant increase in complications. Recommendations for ongoing research are suggested.