Research on media framing of public policies to prevent chronic disease: A narrative synthesis. (September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rowbotham, Samantha; McKinnon, Merryn; Marks, Leah; Hawe, Penelope
• Is Part Of: Social science & medicine. Volume 237(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-09
• Subjects: Chronic disease -- Policy -- Framing -- Media analysis; Social medicine -- Periodicals; Medical anthropology -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine sociale -- Périodiques; Anthropologie médicale -- Périodiques; Santé publique -- Périodiques; Psychologie -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112428
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-9536

Abstract

Abstract: Media coverage plays a key role in shaping public and political attitudes towards policy interventions to improve health. We reviewed studies of news media to identify the arguments used to frame policies that address risk factors for chronic disease, and the impact of different arguments on attitudes to policy. Drawing on a previous scoping review, we identified a subsample of 49 studies of media framing of policies to address risk factors for lifestyle-related chronic disease for further analysis. We extracted and synthesised data to explore key themes. Of the limited research that has been undertaken, most studies have focused on tobacco policy, followed by alcohol, with a small number of studies of food and beverage policies. Studies have primarily used content analysis. Our synthesis demonstrated that advocates and opponents draw on five frames: health, social, economic, practical and ideological. Only a small number of studies have examined the impact of framing on public attitudes towards policy interventions, although such studies have tended to focus on the impact of how problems, rather than solutions (i.e. policies) are framed. Media research is crucial to understanding the complex ways in which attitudes towards policy interventions shape, and are shaped by, public discourses and can provide public health advocates with insights into strategies to successfully position policy arguments. This review highlights key insights and gaps in the hope that this will stimulate further research that will enhance public health advocates' abilities to promote effective public health policy. Highlights: Media studies of policy framing tend to focus on tobacco, alcohol and nutrition. Arguments in support of policy often use health or societal frames. Arguments opposing policies use economic, practical or ideological frames. The effectiveness and impact of frames within different contexts is underexplored. Understanding the influence of framing on attitudes will aid public health advocates.