Harnessing soft innovation resources leads to neo open innovation. (August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tou, Yuji; Watanabe, Chihiro; Moriya, Kuniko; Neittaanmäki, Pekka
• Is Part Of: Technology in society. Volume 58(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-08
• Subjects: Digital economy -- Productivity decline -- Dilemma -- Soft innovation resources -- Neo open innovation; Technology -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; 303.483
• DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.01.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-791X

Abstract

Abstract: Advancement of the digital economy has transformed the concept of the growth crossover in nations and firms, both concerning input and output. Advanced economies have been confronting a dilemma between input increases and output decreases. Contrary to traditional expectations, excessive increase in input has resulted in a productivity decline in output. A solution to this dilemma can only be expected by harnessing the vigor of soft innovation resources that lead to neo open innovation in the digital economy. This paper attempts to demonstrate this hypothetical view. Based on an empirical analysis of the development trajectories of 140 countries and 500 global ICT firms, dynamism, resulting in bipolarization between a virtuous cycle and a vicious cycle between input increases and productivity enhancement, was discovered. Furthermore, an empirical analysis focusing on the development trajectories of two world ICT leaders, Finland and Singapore, identified a mechanism of neo open innovation that assimilates soft innovation resources into a national production system. This mechanism can substitute for research and development (R&D) and removes structural impediments to growth while providing relief from the increasing burden of R&D investment. The above findings provide insightful suggestions for drafting a roadmap towards neo open innovation in the digital economy. Highlights: Neo open innovation in the digital economy was conceptualized. Soft innovation resources lead to neo open innovation was demonstrated. A solution to a dilemma between input increases and output decreases was provided. Suggestions for drafting a roadmap towards neo open innovation were provided. Survival strategies of global ICT leaders were analyzed.