Development and pilot-testing of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for individuals with varying health literacy levels. Issue 10 (October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Woudstra, Anke J.; Smets, Ellen M.A.; Dekker, Evelien; Broens, Tom H.F.; Penning, Judith; Smith, Sian; McCaffery, Kirsten; Fransen, Mirjam P.
• Is Part Of: Patient education and counseling. Volume 102:Issue 10(2019)
• Page Start: 1847
• Page End: 1858
• Publication Date: 2019-10
• Subjects: Decision aid -- Colorectal cancer screening -- Health literacy -- Informed decision making -- Computer-based; Patient education -- Periodicals; Health counseling -- Periodicals; Health education -- Periodicals; Counseling -- Periodicals; Patient Education -- Periodicals; Éducation des patients -- Périodiques; Counseling -- Périodiques; Éducation sanitaire -- Périodiques; 615.5071
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.029
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0738-3991

Abstract

Highlights: The DA is promising in supporting informed decision making about CRC screening. Computer-based DAs can be acceptable for individuals with varying health literacy. Further refinement of interactive features is needed to improve the DA's usability. Abstract: Objective: Making an informed decision about colorectal cancer screening requires health literacy. Our aim was to develop and pilot-test a computer-based decision aid to support informed decision making about whether or not to participate in colorectal cancer screening for individuals with varying health literacy levels in the Netherlands. Methods: First, we designed and adapted the decision aid prototype among 25 individuals with low (n = 15) and adequate (n = 10) health literacy. Second, we used a before/after study to assess changes in knowledge, attitude, intention, decisional conflict, deliberation, anxiety and risk perception in an online survey among 81 individuals eligible for colorectal cancer screening with low (n = 35) and adequate (n = 46) health literacy. Results: The decision aid was acceptable, comprehensible, reduced decisional conflict, increased deliberation and improved knowledge about colorectal cancer screening, but not about colorectal cancer, among individuals with adequate and low health literacy. Usability was slightly higher for participants with adequate health literacy compared to those with low health literacy. Conclusion: The decision aid is promising in supporting informed decision making about colorectal cancer screening, also among individuals with lower health literacy. Practice implications: Further refinement of interactive features, such as videos, animations and the values clarification exercise, is needed to increase the usability of the decision aid.