Implant-based breast reconstruction with Artia™ tissue matrix. Issue 9 (September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fakim, Bilal; Highton, Lyndsey; Gandhi, Ashu; Johnson, Richard; Murphy, John
• Is Part Of: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. Volume 72:Issue 9(2019)
• Page Start: 1548
• Page End: 1554
• Publication Date: 2019-09
• Subjects: Breast reconstruction -- Acellular dermal matrix -- Artia™ -- Breast implant; Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 617.9505
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.05.024
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1748-6815

Abstract

Summary: Background: In 2015, Artia™ (LifeCell, NJ), a new porcine acellular dermal matrix (ADM), was introduced at our unit. As there is lack of clinical studies on its use in breast reconstruction, the purpose of this prospective study was to assess outcome data for patients who underwent Artia™-assisted breast reconstruction. We compared these data with those of other studies of non-human ADMs in widespread use from the literature. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent Artia™-assisted breast reconstruction between July 2016 and February 2018 were identified. A prospective database was maintained, including data of patient demographics, type of reconstruction, type of implant, oncological data if applicable, complication rates and adjuvant treatment delays. Results: Fifty-one patients undergoing 83 implant-based breast reconstructions with Artia™ were included in the study. Of the 83 reconstructions, 62% were performed following risk-reducing mastectomy, 28% following therapeutic mastectomy and 10% for revision procedures. After a mean 276-day follow-up period, the overall complication rate was 10.8%, including 6 breasts (7.2%) developing seromas requiring aspiration, 1 breast developing a haematoma (1.2%) and 2 implant losses (2.4%) in a single patient following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. There were no cases of wound dehiscence or erythema/red breast syndrome. Conclusion: This is one of the first studies demonstrating that Artia™-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction is associated with low and acceptable early complication rates. The results are promising and are comparable to our experience using established ADMs, with an implant loss rate of 4.9% across 500 ADM-assisted implant reconstructions.